Robert Goodman |
Tue Oct 08, 2013 02:39pm |
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn
(Post 906994)
Where you rubbed a few the wrong way was the "it cost us the game" quip.
NO Official is going to read that without bristling (self included).
|
Then there's something mind-corrupting about officiating.
Quote:
You got "daggers" because you started with daggers. One decision went in a way you disliked.
|
"Cost us the game" is a very, very common remark. It's said, and at least arguably correctly, even when the various "costs" during a game, tournament, or season add up to much more than the difference. But this is not crooked accounting.
If a candidate loses an election by 100 votes, and there were many factors that each caused hir to get 200 fewer votes, each of them can rightly be said to have cost hir the election. It's saying that if everything else were kept the same, this difference would produce that difference, and that's a sensible way to discuss it. If actions by elections officials could've been among the factors that each caused the candidate to get 200 votes fewer, someone's saying so should not cause elections officials everywhere in the world to bristle.
|