The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Football (https://forum.officiating.com/football/)
-   -   Is this legal in NFHS? (https://forum.officiating.com/football/96161-legal-nfhs.html)

voiceoflg Tue Sep 24, 2013 12:57pm

Is this legal in NFHS?
 
Eastern Kentucky-Morehead State:

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/-a23JuEeitY?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

maven Tue Sep 24, 2013 01:00pm

Provided that it was caught behind the NZ (very close), yes.

If beyond the NZ, then it would be a dead ball, R 1/10, and some risk of KCI (obstructing R's path to the kick).

asdf Tue Sep 24, 2013 01:00pm

Yep...

Provided the kick did was caught behind the NZ, the player could have passed it forward or even kicked it again.

asdf Tue Sep 24, 2013 01:02pm

Sorry Maven....

You beat me to the punch

MD Longhorn Tue Sep 24, 2013 01:53pm

Honestly, this play should have been ended at the moment of the catch - he was beyond the NZ, and HL should have caught that.

Rich Tue Sep 24, 2013 02:04pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn (Post 905920)
Honestly, this play should have been ended at the moment of the catch - he was beyond the NZ, and HL should have caught that.

I don't think so, myself. LOS was the 40, he caught it at the 40. Unless he's clearly illegal, he's legal, IMO.

OKREF Tue Sep 24, 2013 04:14pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich (Post 905921)
I don't think so, myself. LOS was the 40, he caught it at the 40. Unless he's clearly illegal, he's legal, IMO.

His first touch might have been at the forty, but possession was gained at the 41, IMO.

MD Longhorn Tue Sep 24, 2013 04:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKREF (Post 905936)
His first touch might have been at the forty, but possession was gained at the 41, IMO.

Were that the case, he'd be legal.

I just don't think that's the case. Looking at the LOS (and the stick), and then looking at where he gets the ball, I think he's ahead of that line.

I do admit it's not a perfect angle.

Suudy Tue Sep 24, 2013 05:33pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn (Post 905946)
Were that the case, he'd be legal.

Is there a distinction in NCAA (or even NFHS) between first touching and second, third, etc?

The kick doesn't end until possessed by either team or the ball otherwise becomes dead. If A touches a kick (and adds a new force) behind the LOS then gains possession of the ball beyond the LOS, would the ball not be dead and be B's ball at the point possession was gained?

BktBallRef Tue Sep 24, 2013 06:10pm

If this was a screen pass and linemen were 5 yards downfield, would you have flagged them for ineligible downfield? I wouldn't have.

I think he catches it behind the 40, which qualifies as in or behind the NZ. The ball has to cross the 40, not his foot.

OKREF Tue Sep 24, 2013 06:53pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BktBallRef (Post 905956)
If this was a screen pass and linemen were 5 yards downfield, would you have flagged them for ineligible downfield? I wouldn't have.

I think he catches it behind the 40, which qualifies as in or behind the NZ. The ball has to cross the 40, not his foot.

He doesn't catch the ball behind the forty. He touches it, bobbles it and catches the ball, controls it at the 41.

BktBallRef Tue Sep 24, 2013 08:29pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKREF (Post 905960)
He doesn't catch the ball behind the forty. He touches it, bobbles it and catches the ball, controls it at the 41.

We can agree to disagree.

Welpe Wed Sep 25, 2013 08:25am

When he actually comes down and makes the catch, I think it is close but the ball seems to be right on the 40 with his right leg at around the 41. Speaking NCAA any touching in or behind the neutral zone before the kick crosses the neutral zone is ignored.

maven Wed Sep 25, 2013 08:41am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welpe (Post 905976)
When he actually comes down and makes the catch, I think it is close but the ball seems to be right on the 40 with his right leg at around the 41. Speaking NCAA any touching in or behind the neutral zone before the kick crosses the neutral zone is ignored.

That's what I see. If not clearly beyond, it's behind.

bigjohn Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:07am

In NFHS is it the NZ or ENZ??

ART. 3 . . . Any K player may catch or recover a scrimmage kick while it is in
or behind the neutral zone and advance, unless it is during a try.


ART. 5 . . . When any K player touches a scrimmage kick beyond the expanded neutral zone to R’s goal line before it is touched beyond the neutral zone by R
and before the ball has come to rest, it is referred to as “first touching of the kick”
and the place is the “spot of first touching.” Such touching is ignored if it is
caused by R pushing or blocking K into contact with the ball.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1