The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Football (https://forum.officiating.com/football/)
-   -   Possession (https://forum.officiating.com/football/95774-possession.html)

CT1 Sat Aug 10, 2013 06:16am

Quote:

Originally Posted by HLin NC (Post 902195)
There isn't one. But since we can infer that held is with the hands, why would the Fed use the term controlled in the same definition?

Good question. But if they meant for legs to be included, why wouldn't they just add the phrase "by hands or legs" to the definition?

Maybe "or controlled" was put in to prevent an opposing player from playing tug-of-war if the ball was between a player's lower legs. I just don't know.

ajmc Sat Aug 10, 2013 07:01pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by CT1 (Post 902185)
Where is the definition of "controlled"?

As has been indicated, there is no definition of "controlled" in the NFHS rules, so the next place to look seems like my Funk & Wagnalls, who defines control (trolled, ctrolling) as, "To exercise a directing, restraining or governing influence over".

So back to the original question, "What I am asking is if clutching the ball with the legs is possession?", if the clutching with the legs has restrained the ball, it seems B is effectively "controlling the ball" and has possession.

Rob4092xx Fri Aug 16, 2013 01:49am

Agree.......by rule!

Walter Duane Robinson
Walter D. Robinson


Quote:

Originally Posted by HLin NC (Post 902152)
If we're talking NFHS, R23 is down.

That is why the definition of possession includes the term "held OR controlled".



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1