The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Football (https://forum.officiating.com/football/)
-   -   Strange Youth Football Play (https://forum.officiating.com/football/92369-strange-youth-football-play.html)

tomes1978 Sun Sep 09, 2012 09:27am

Strange Youth Football Play
 
The snapper snapped the ball. The QB touched the ball (not sure if planned or if he had a hard time getting the ball), but the snapper then took off running with the ball. What should the call be? I have two options... either a snap infraction, which would have caused the ball to remain dead, which I don't think happened because the QB did touch the ball. Or maybe illegal handing. What do you all think? Have you seen this before?

maven Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:59am

Read rule 2.

2-40-2:
"The snap begins when the snapper first moves the ball legally other
than in adjustment. In a snap, the movement must be a quick and continuous
backward motion of the ball during which the ball immediately leaves the hand(s)
of the snapper
and touches a back or the ground before it touches an A lineman."

Also, see 7-2-4:

"A snap shall be such that the ball immediately leaves the hand or
hands of the snapper
and touches a backfield player or the ground before it
touches an A lineman. A scrimmage down must start with a legal snap. An illegal
snap causes the ball to remain dead."

If the snapper fails to release the ball, it's an illegal snap. Dead ball enforcement (7-1-4), 5 yards, replay the down.

BktBallRef Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:15am

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomes1978 (Post 853773)
The snapper snapped the ball. The QB touched the ball (not sure if planned or if he had a hard time getting the ball), but the snapper then took off running with the ball. What should the call be? I have two options... either a snap infraction, which would have caused the ball to remain dead, which I don't think happened because the QB did touch the ball. Or maybe illegal handing. What do you all think? Have you seen this before?


Snap infraction. Ball never left the snapper's hand.

tomes1978 Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:32am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BktBallRef (Post 853786)
Snap infraction. Ball never left the snapper's hand.


Yep, I should have blown it dead! That's why I like working youth games you see crap like this!

JasonTX Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:00pm

This is the classic "center sneak". It's a planned play. I've seen this play at youth level here in Texas. We shut it down as an illegal snap. The coach went nuts and we had to have him escorted out. You'd think that these coaches would realize there is a reason they don't run this play at the higher levels and that's because it's illegal.

Forksref Mon Sep 10, 2012 06:39am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JasonTX (Post 853886)
This is the classic "center sneak". It's a planned play. I've seen this play at youth level here in Texas. We shut it down as an illegal snap. The coach went nuts and we had to have him escorted out. You'd think that these coaches would realize there is a reason they don't run this play at the higher levels and that's because it's illegal.

The coach should be permanently escorted out of the league. There is no room for coaches who teach trick, unethical plays. They should be working on fundamentals as well as fair play, sportsmanship, dealing with winning and losing, setting goals, etc. There is SO much to be taught to kids in sports other than doing anything to win. They miss out on a great opportunity.

HLin NC Mon Sep 10, 2012 08:05am

Reason #716 not to work youth ball.

BigBaldGuy Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:29am

Did they also run the wrong ball play? Youth coached crack me up.

Robert Goodman Mon Sep 10, 2012 01:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Forksref (Post 853918)
The coach should be permanently escorted out of the league.

Isn't that extreme for someone who just didn't know a rule? You should understand that coaches of children's football are volunteers, many of whom don't have that much knowledge of the game.

We're down to 2 coaches per team in our division. It can be hard to find people willing to coach, and recent publicity of a severe child abuse case associated with children's sports and with American football hasn't helped.

Besides their availability, coaches are often chosen for their experience in keeping the att'n of children. Knowledge of the game is good, but sometimes has to take a back seat to other consider'ns.

JasonTX Mon Sep 10, 2012 01:56pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert Goodman (Post 853986)
Isn't that extreme for someone who just didn't know a rule? You should understand that coaches of children's football are volunteers, many of whom don't have that much knowledge of the game.

We're down to 2 coaches per team in our division. It can be hard to find people willing to coach, and recent publicity of a severe child abuse case associated with children's sports and with American football hasn't helped.

Besides their availability, coaches are often chosen for their experience in keeping the att'n of children. Knowledge of the game is good, but sometimes has to take a back seat to other consider'ns.

For some coaches, perhaps. Not this one. Long story short, after he was ejected, he was overheard by some of his own kids parents telling the players out in the parking lot that they should try to hurt the other team in the second half. Sure enough, there was an obvious late hit with intent to injure. We asked the kids if they were instructed to do that and we then warned the other coaches that if there was any further incident the game would be over. Sure enough, next play a kid drives a kid out of bounds 10 yards into the fence. Game over. We reported the coach and he was banned from coaching in league. This was 7 years ago.

MD Longhorn Mon Sep 10, 2012 01:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert Goodman (Post 853986)
Isn't that extreme for someone who just didn't know a rule? You should understand that coaches of children's football are volunteers, many of whom don't have that much knowledge of the game.

We're down to 2 coaches per team in our division. It can be hard to find people willing to coach, and recent publicity of a severe child abuse case associated with children's sports and with American football hasn't helped.

Besides their availability, coaches are often chosen for their experience in keeping the att'n of children. Knowledge of the game is good, but sometimes has to take a back seat to other consider'ns.

I see your point, although in Texas we don't really have that issue. Yes, there are dumb coaches - at youth, but also at HS and everything in between. But there's no shortage of dads that want to be involved in coaching the teams because they think it gives their kid a leg up. And every single one of them think that every single game, from 6U to HS, is Monday Night Freaking Football.

maven Mon Sep 10, 2012 02:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert Goodman (Post 853986)
Isn't that extreme for someone who just didn't know a rule?

Ignorance was not that individual's only failing. Or perhaps you don't understand what "the coach went nuts" means, or what his behavior teaches his players?

DLH17 Mon Sep 10, 2012 02:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbcrowder (Post 853998)
I see your point, although in Texas we don't really have that issue. Yes, there are dumb coaches - at youth, but also at HS and everything in between. But there's no shortage of dads that want to be involved in coaching the teams because they think it gives their kid a leg up. And every single one of them think that every single game, from 6U to HS, is Monday Night Freaking Football.

No greater truth has been written.

tomes1978 Mon Sep 10, 2012 04:27pm

Yeah and I found out today, as I work with someone who was at the game because his nephew was on the team, that the crowd was complaining that I threw a flag on it and could not understand how it was against the rules. Now I did have it wrong as I whould have killed it as a dead ball penaltly, but regardless, some things just crack me up.

jchamp Mon Sep 10, 2012 06:30pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by maven (Post 854003)
Ignorance was not that individual's only failing. Or perhaps you don't understand what "the coach went nuts" means, or what his behavior teaches his players?

Meh. "The coach went nuts" is relative and could mean anything from a minor tantrum that wouldn't get you confined to a baseball dugout, to a full-on epic instant-youtube-sensation meltdown.

Teaching players to cheat and hurt the opponents is sociopathic, though, and rightfully deserves to be forcefully extricated from the league. With steel batons, if necessary.

(I rarely advocate violence, but when a man teaches children to hurt other children, physical violence is a far more merciful fate than what some mothers would come up with.)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1