![]() |
|
|
|||
I agree with both of you.
However our supervisor told us there is no agreement on this play all the way to the top, so we're to enforce it from the 20 yard line. My contention is that regardless of momentum, B is responsible for putting the ball in his own endzone, therefore 10-4-7 is the correct application. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() |
|
|||
It seems to me that while B did take the ball into the endzone, they fumbled the ball out of the endzone. The ball was bouncing so it was a grounded loose ball at the time it was kicked. The kick applied a new force which then caused to ball to re-enter the endzone and over the endline. The result of the play is a touch back due to A applying a force to the ball, causing it to go over the endline. Assuming that the kick was intentional, then we also have a foul on A for an illegal kick. The choices given to B as to take the penalty, and have 1/10 at their 7, or decline the penalty and take the result of the play which is a touchback. Obviously they would decline the penalty and take the ball at the 20.
|
|
|||
How did you come up with this? IK is a 15-yd penalty in FED. Plus, the basic spot for a loose ball foul after a fumble is the end of the related run, which in this case in in B's EZ.
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Public Address announcer/ Play by play | Terrapins Fan | Basketball | 34 | Sun Dec 13, 2009 12:20pm |
Force play or time play? | Rita C | Baseball | 44 | Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:12am |
was a force play, became a tag play ? | _Bruno_ | Baseball | 8 | Sun Aug 19, 2007 11:13am |
Play-by-Play Commentary | FC IC | Basketball | 2 | Sat Dec 21, 2002 12:28am |
CBS play-by-play announcers: should they all be fired? | David Clausi | Basketball | 6 | Mon Mar 27, 2000 11:56pm |