Would you rule USC on B??
SITUATION 9:
On fourth and one from B's 21-yard line, all A players are set, as defensive end B1 is in a two-point stance across from offensive tackle A5 along their respective lines of scrimmage. While the quarterback is calling signals, B1 (a) claps his hands, (b) stomps his foot, or (c) shifts to a wider position on the line and immediately returns to his original position. RULING: In (a) and (b), if in the official's judgment the action by B1 was for the purpose of disconcerting or hindering A, it is an unsportsmanlike conduct foul. In this case, the official should sound his whistle before the snap. In (c), the movement is legal. (9-5-1d) This is from the 2007 NFHS Rules Interpretations Powerpoint This is still a valid interpretation isn't it? Why would an official judge that the defender was doing anything other than trying to make A false start in a or b? I have asked officials why they won't call this and they say, hey man that is just football! |
If I judge that B is ONLY trying to make A false start, I will warn and then flag.
I worked with a guy a couple weeks ago in a game where B called out "shift!" shortly before the snap and shifted their D-linemen to a different gap. This guy wanted me to tell the coach that if their call caused a false start he would flag them for USC. I disagreed with that, since B is allowed to audible and conduct normal defensive maneuvers. |
The correct answer is: "Coach, in my judgment, he wasn't disconcerting."
|
Canadian Ruling
Quote:
If in (a), A's cadence is difficult to hear, we just tell them to knock it off; problem solved. (b) and (c) are legal. |
No where in this rule does it say warn first time then flag!
|
Quote:
Accept it, or work to get it changed in your local area. |
Of course most officials don't call this rule by the book either!
SECTION 8 NONCONTACT UNSPORTSMANLIKE CONDUCT BY NONPLAYERS ART. 1 . . . No coach, substitute, athletic trainer or other team attendant shall act in an unsportsmanlike manner once the game officials assume authority for the contest. Examples are, but not limited to: a. Using profanity, insulting or vulgar language or gestures. NOTE: The NFHS disapproves of any form of taunting which is intended or designed to embarrass, ridicule or demean others under any circumstances including on the basis of race, religion, gender or national origin. b. Attempting to influence a decision by a game official. c. Disrespectfully addressing a game official. d. Indicating objections to a game official’s decision. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
"all year"? Pshaw, I'll accept nothing less then "in my entire life"
|
I mean, come on! Anyone ever called this?
d. Indicating objections to a game official’s decision. |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
Well, the "3 in the box" pretty much killed that tactic. With only 3 coaches, losing one would probably be too much for them. Since then, they've been far less annoying, and no longer have the assigned rider. |
No I wouldn't rule USC on this here because it's not USC.
|
PENALTY: Unsportsmanlike conduct (Arts. 1, 2) – (S27) – (S7-27) – if dead
ball, 15 yards. Also disqualification if flagrant – (S47). In Article 1a, the player must remove the offending item before he is allowed to participate. The second unsportsmanlike foul results in disqualification. (See 9-8 PENALTY) a and b deal with clapping of hands and stomping of feet, not verbage! B1 (a) claps his hands, (b) stomps his foot, |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Maybe quote the whole rule, and not just a part that obviously does not apply... |
Quote:
In your games, the official has judged that the actions DO NOT rise to that level. |
Also, to add ... the issue that this penalty deals with is sound designed to draw the offense off. Are you guys playing your football games on hardwood or something? I can't even fathom a player being able to stomp his feet on a football field loud enough that ANYONE can hear it - and certainly not loud enough to mess anyone up. Yet you seem bent out of shape and angry over it. Are they wearing tapshoes or something?
|
Quote:
As for the "warn then flag" approach: I can imagine an extreme case where B's actions could ONLY be interpreted as disconcerting. But that's rarely what we see. We usually see borderline cases: the point of warning is to let B know that their actions are borderline, and if they persist it might become apparent that their aim is to disconcert. And at that point, they would warrant the flag. |
Quote:
|
I wonder if bigjohn goes on police web sites and criticizes them for not giving speeding tickets to guys who drive 56 in a 55 zone.
|
Quote:
|
You boys never been to Hanging Rock Ohio I see!
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37pm. |