![]() |
|
|||
NFHS - Rule 5-1-2(a)
A 2/10 @ A5. Sweep to the sideline for no gain. After the play, each team is called for a personal foul with B's foul clearly occuring first. What is the down and distance of the next play?
|
|
|||
Can't figure 3rd and 5 even as a decent wrong answer. 3rd and 10, maybe - from the offsetting fouls crowd (incorrect as well), but how's 3rd and 5 a possibility?
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
I think he means by walking 15 one way, then half the distance (or 10 yds) the other way, leaving the chains where they were, and then playing 3rd down. That'd be 3rd and 5 from the 10.
|
|
|||
Rule ref? This exact play (nearly) was discussed (well... yelled about) at a clinic just last season - basically ALL of the instructors and half of the room vs one guy who insisted they offset. It was clear that if the fouls were completely separate from each other, to enforce them in order. Only nearly simultaneous fouls were to be offset (including nearly immediate retaliation fouls).
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
10-1-5 (FR-96)
Emphasis is mine. Quote:
AR 10-1-5-III Quote:
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers Last edited by Welpe; Tue Sep 13, 2011 at 01:53pm. |
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Balance both UR fouls at PBD. Since they're both URs, Team A does not get the AFD from B's UR. Result: 3D/10 @ A-5.
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
I guess in my head the separation was more distinct in the OP than the caseplay you posted (I did mention that retaliatory PF's would offset, as in the caseplay)
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
before any of the penalties have been completed
before any of the penalties have been completed
this allows a pretty large window...and it shouldn't matter if they were committed on opposite sides of the field.
__________________
The officials lament, or the coaches excuses as it were: "I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was going to blame you" |
|
|||
Fair enough, and point taken.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
i agree
I agree though that the case play doesn't make a very good case for the larg window of separation....
__________________
The officials lament, or the coaches excuses as it were: "I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was going to blame you" |
|
|||
I think my thread has been highjacked by the NCAA group, which is a much easier rule to come to a conclusion on.
Back to NHFS...I agree with those who answered 1/10 @ A10, but the rule is not very clear in my eyes, or the people I'm trying to convince. Does anyone have any older casebook plays or other material to help plead my case? |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NFHS rule changes | cdoug | Football | 5 | Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:03am |
NFHS Rule 7.5.12 | SC Ump | Football | 8 | Wed Jun 18, 2008 09:30pm |
Need some help with NFHS rule | kraine27 | Football | 3 | Fri Aug 24, 2007 11:48am |
Any rule changes in NFHS for 06-07? | dsimp8 | Basketball | 1 | Tue Oct 24, 2006 04:43pm |
NEW - 2003 NFHS Football Rule Changes (as written by the NFHS Rules Committee) | KWH | Football | 27 | Tue Jan 21, 2003 11:30am |