![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
[/QUOTE] distance back to the goal line for the A RP. 11 + 15 = 26, then to the 13. 1st and 10 for A. [/B][/QUOTE] The only issue here is interpretive, and I doubt it a difficult one. Is the punch/swear word a UR/Objectionable, a Rough Play/Objectionable, or a Rough Play alone. I'd adjudicate it a Rough Play alone, *UNLESS* the "bad word" was a racial or religious slur, in which case, I get out the objectionable - or worse. A) A1's actions are considered Rough Play alone: Ball goes from the three to the 18 (3+15) for the B UR, then half the distance for the RP = at the nine yard line, third down repeated. C) As above - same result, as the RP is only half the distance to the goal. B) A1's actions are considered to be UR + Objectionable Ball goes from the three to the 18 for the B UR, then half the distance for the 15-yard (nine yard line) then half the distance for the additive Objectionable (which in Canadian is just ten yards, btw), ergo, third down on the 4.5 yard line. Clear as mud? Welcome to Canadian ball. ![]()
__________________
Am I just a three-down ref in a four-down world? |
Bookmarks |
|
|