The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Football (https://forum.officiating.com/football/)
-   -   Redskins - Giants (https://forum.officiating.com/football/54632-redskins-giants.html)

BktBallRef Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:23am

Redskins - Giants
 
For anyone who saw the game, what are your thoughts on the Moss-Webster situation early in the 2nd quarter?

I thought both players should have been ejected and the decision not to created more problems throughout the game. I understand you try to keep players in the game. But these two guys were knocking each others heads off like Rock'em-Sock'em robots. They needed to go.

Rich Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:42am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BktBallRef (Post 625171)
For anyone who saw the game, what are your thoughts on the Moss-Webster situation early in the 2nd quarter?

I thought both players should have been ejected and the decision not to created more problems throughout the game. I understand you try to keep players in the game. But these two guys were knocking each others heads off like Rock'em-Sock'em robots. They needed to go.

I agree. I was surprised they weren't ejected.

jaybird Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:13am

I agree as well. I thought for sure that they would both be ejected, especially Moss.

BktBallRef Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:33pm

I'm surprised there weren't more comments. maybe many on here didn't see it. I thought it was blatantly obvious.

bbcof83 Tue Sep 15, 2009 01:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BktBallRef (Post 625171)
For anyone who saw the game, what are your thoughts on the Moss-Webster situation early in the 2nd quarter?

I thought both players should have been ejected and the decision not to created more problems throughout the game. I understand you try to keep players in the game. But these two guys were knocking each others heads off like Rock'em-Sock'em robots. They needed to go.

Agreed, at the HS level that would be automatic ejection from me. Of course, in the NFL, they have different standards for what constitutes ejection. Also, that was very early in the game if I remember correctly. Neither had probably shown signs of instigating to that point thus this was looked at as a first offense so just a PF. I don't agree with that but that's the way I believe the officials saw it.

Welpe Tue Sep 15, 2009 01:07pm

I didn't see the game, sorry.

movingthechains Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:58pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbcof83 (Post 625480)
Agreed, at the HS level that would be automatic ejection from me. Of course, in the NFL, they have different standards for what constitutes ejection. Also, that was very early in the game if I remember correctly. Neither had probably shown signs of instigating to that point thus this was looked at as a first offense so just a PF. I don't agree with that but that's the way I believe the officials saw it.

I think they should have been tossed!!!!!!!

BktBallRef Wed Sep 16, 2009 07:28pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbcof83 (Post 625480)
Agreed, at the HS level that would be automatic ejection from me. Of course, in the NFL, they have different standards for what constitutes ejection. Also, that was very early in the game if I remember correctly. Neither had probably shown signs of instigating to that point thus this was looked at as a first offense so just a PF. I don't agree with that but that's the way I believe the officials saw it.

It was early second period, so they were well into the game. I thought the defining point was that they continued to throw punches before the whistle, and well after the whistle, even as they were being separated. It set the stage for similiar, those less flagrant stuff the rest of the game.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1