![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Feet In Bounds?
I have a question about the rule on a player landing inbounds after a legal catch...of course I am referring to Holmes catch at the end of the game. I have seen several still photo angles, and from the front, it looks like both feet hit the ground, while from the rear, it looks like the trail foot never hit the ground, and actually landed on the foot that was indeed on the ground. I am simply wanting to know what the definitive NFL rule for the play is...do both feet need to touch the ground, or is one on top of the other good enough. Not trying to start a controversy, because like many big plays, I think the only one who will truly ever know is Holmes himself...Thank you in advance for any replies
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell! |
|
|||
|
thanks
Quote:
one other comment though, on the Harrison personal foul penalty, he did punch the player at least once before they seperated and then he proceeded to flagrantly push the Cardinal player down. Whether that warrants an ejection is open for debate, but there was at least one punch thrown that was captured by NBC cameras and shown in the extended replay. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| dumbass, fanboy, good night-gracie, idiot |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ** Superbowl XL Crew ** | JugglingReferee | Football | 65 | Sun Feb 26, 2006 06:11pm |
| Superbowl Officials | menigirl | Feedback | 0 | Tue Sep 28, 2004 01:19am |
| 2 questionable calls | Greyhounds30 | Football | 6 | Fri Sep 24, 2004 06:59pm |
| Anyone Going To Houston for the SuperBowl | whiskers_ump | Softball | 11 | Thu Feb 05, 2004 02:42pm |
| Superbowl apartment for rent!! | SuperbowlHouston | Football | 1 | Mon Jan 19, 2004 03:46am |