The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 1.67 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 11, 2009, 09:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
"Of course" means the same as "it's obvious that". Why would you say "of course" about something that's not obvious?
Everyone knows that A has the option to kick on any down. If it is first down and the A-11 is used then it is not obvious that A will actually kick during the down. They have the option to kick but it is not obvious that a kick may be attempted as basically teams never punt on first down.

When A lines up in a SKF on 4th down it is obvious that a kick may be attempted as it is common to kick on 4th down.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmc View Post
"Struggling" may have been stronger than necessary and a little presumptious, perhaps "hoping" they announce something might be more accurate. Does that make any difference?
The NFHS is "hoping to announce their decision regarding this situation"? That doesn't make any sense. We all know they will meet and decide on changes then announce them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmc View Post
Have no idea where you're coming from regarding, "That doesn't solve the problem of teams not having anyone numbered 50-79 on the field.", I thought that issue was settled by the current numbering exception.
Yes, the current numbering exception covers that. Teams use the A-11 to get around the numbering exception which creates the problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmc View Post
The suggestion about simply lengthening the time frame "A" players would have to be set, limited to when they choose to avail themselves of the numbering exception doesn't affect the suggested purpose of the numbering exception at all, or any other rules for that matter.
Having zero players numbered 50-79 creates problems. The defense and officials can get confused during the down about who is eligible and who is not. Having to be set for a longer period of time does not change that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmc View Post
Unfortunately, the A-11 offense may have let a nasty genie out of the bottle, and getting it back in, without creating a bunch of other unintentional problems, may not be so simple.
The NCAA already has it covered on 1st-3rd downs. As far as I know the NCAA has not had any problems with their numbering exception.
 

Bookmarks

Tags
fat lady is singing, hello kettle!, hyena love


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New 2009 BRD Questions SAump Baseball 18 Wed Dec 31, 2008 01:08am
2008 - 2009 Rules Interps Situation 6 mdray Basketball 4 Fri Oct 31, 2008 02:11pm
NFHS Rules Changes 2009 (Sort of) Tim C Baseball 29 Thu Jul 03, 2008 09:25am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1