![]() |
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
There were no games involving a "NE" Missouri State yesterday. There was one involving "NW" Missouri State. And in THAT game, the onside kickoff call you are referring to was made by the F, NOT the B. The F had a much better look at what had transpired than did we couch potatoes. He signalled immediately which tells me he saw something others did not see. The replays bore out the accuracy of the call.
|
|
|||
sorry about not getting the names correct but if you saw a replay that 'bore out the accuracy of the call", then we must not be talking about the same game- or you are privy to more replays than what they showed. Last edited by kfo9494; Sun Dec 14, 2008 at 11:44am. |
|
|||
I saw it.
I think the F was premature in his signal. I thought they'd be digging in the pile. I don't think the replay was very clear. The best that R could have gotten out of it was a joint-possession in which they'd get the ball. When I did college ball, we always said, "Only the strong survive." In others words, if we can't see immediately who has possession, you have to give the ball to the team who has it last. |
|
|||
I don't think the signal was premature at all. Keep in mind guys that we weren't in his position. I thought there was angle that showed the UMD player with possession of the ball. Was it a clear view? No, but I thought there was a shot where you could see the ball in the player's possession.
If the F had a view of the player with the ball, why wait to signal? The only thing I would suggest the F to do in the future would be to signal more emphatically to sell the call. If he did that, maybe we wouldn't be discussing this play. As for NEMO State, it is now called Truman State and is in the same conference as NW MO State.
__________________
Check out my football officials resource page at http://resources.refstripes.com If you have a file you would like me to add, email me and I will get it posted. |
|
|||
Didn't see the play, but it is so important to know when it's necessary "to sell" a call. We all understand that we shouldn't be making a call, unless we're sure of what we're calling, but there are definitely situations where demonstrating just how sure we are of a particular call can make all the difference as to how that call will be received.
Fumble recovery is generally one of those circumstances. When you decide a player has possession of the ball, and he's on the ground, nothing that subsequently changes matters. It's like a knee brushing the ground, the ball breaking the plane, someone landing or touching a sideline. The only person who needs to see those things is you, as long as you're sure of what you've seen. When you're sure, you should leave absolutely no doubt as to what you are sure of. Your reaction will make a big difference as to how the call is received. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Women's Division 1 Officials | Scrapper1 | Basketball | 1 | Sun Jun 01, 2008 08:34pm |
Double division lines | TwoDot | Basketball | 5 | Thu Feb 09, 2006 01:36pm |
NCAA Division I Officials | edman42 | Basketball | 6 | Tue Dec 13, 2005 09:34pm |
Division I aspirations? | mpeterson_1 | Basketball | 30 | Sun Dec 15, 2002 01:19am |
Division One Officials | Buck Wu | Basketball | 12 | Wed Feb 07, 2001 03:38pm |