![]() |
Quote:
:eek: |
In 5 years I've been in 4 states...
Illinois - 5 officials all the way through, and yes, downstate we have plenty of officials to go to more. (I did see a 6-man crew work a tv game, and they were as sloppy as could be, I think they added a 6th since they were on tv and made up the mechanics) Indiana - 5 Missouri - 5 officials regular season, districts, and state playoffs. Nebraska - Outside of the Omaha-Lincoln areas 5 officials has just recently become the norm. In fact there are still a dozen or so crews working 4 officials on 8-man games. The state only allows 5 man crews to apply for playoffs. Here schools pay the crew, so its $300 for the crew whether you bring 4 or 7. Since I just moved here, I was #6 on our crew, and we worked 6-man in the old Illini-Badger NCAA d3 conference, but I wouldn't try to teach that to a crew of 5 guys who have only worked 5 for 3 years in a pregame. We're now wrestling with school in basketball, state wants to go to 3 and schools who have been paying $100 for 2 are only willing to pay $120 for 3. Having worked 6 man I enjoyed the dead-ball help on the sidelines, and the over-the-top help. I worked both a deep wing and an umpire, as a deep wing you have to be a little slower and trust your umpire to kill the obvious short-hop in front of the player. Umpire, has to do what he is suposed to do anyway, he just has to be more diligent about it. All that being said, I would rather have 10 well trained eyes, than 12 so-so trained eyes. |
New Jersey -
5 man crew for varsity. There's been some chatter about expanding this to 7 man for post season play. 3 or 4 for subvarsity, depending on how many the league or school is willing to pay. |
Quote:
On a crew of 4, the limiting factor is when a newbie is on the crew. Sometimes, we have a senior guy as a volunteer 5th, working deep, and slightly favouring the newbie's (as HL) sideline. When I'm a U or R, I also favour the newbie's sideline. In recent memory, I've had only 1 call that I saw that I didn't flag that I should have. :mad: |
Quote:
|
This may surprise many school and league andministrators, but the game of football has evolved, just somewhat, over the past 30 years. The way the game is generally played today, a 4 man configuration places coverage requirements on the wing officials, that is simply unrealistic.
The players are faster, the strategies employed are far more complex, varied and spread out and they develop over much wider portions of the field. Couple that with this increasingly nonsensical expectation of microscopic precision on the most minute detail and it's no wonder the frustration level is so high on the review of 4 man mechanics. With the development of decades of youth football, the notion that sub-varsity contests are somehow less complicated or can be managed with a 3 man configuration is just wishful thinking. Added to that environment is the component of younger, less experienced coaches whose expectations are often "off the charts". There's simply no arguing 3 man mechanics, whether it's R-U-L or R-LJ-L or any attempt at a variation, you can't fill 4 holes with 3 pegs. Advocates and critics agree that experience is beneficial. The more snaps, games and exposure the better. Unfortunately, snaps, games and exposure also naturally bring "years" with them, as the years increase so does age and one of the things that age doesn't mix that well with (in most instances) is continued or increased physical speed, which may be the greatest assest a wing official needs in a 4 man configuration. Adding a 5th official (BJ) makes a big difference, although the coverage responsibilities of the wing officials remains considerable. The 6th man, makes a huge difference in the responsibilities, and focus of the LJ and L while the reduced coverage area suits a more experienced (older) official's physical capabilities (in general). About the only things that have remained totally unchanged in the game of football, over the past 30ish years, is the mechanics for 3 and 4 man coverage, while the game itself has evolved dramatically. Doing an even outstanding job with a 4 man crew, isn't serving the game as well as the game deserves, which is not a negative reflection on the officials busting their tails chasing the game. |
Someone mentioned that the U has more responsibilities in 6-man compared to 5-man. Can you elaborate?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
in MASS, we have 5 for varsity. Mostly 3 for subvarsity. but some conferences only use TWO officials for subvarsity. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
5-man for Varsity FB here in WI...4 minimum in an emergency, I guess. Have yet to see a Varsity game with 4. 4 are recommended and 3 required for JV or Frosh games. Work AAYFL youth league games that use their own mixed with Fed rules and we've been trying like he11 to get 4 man mandated, but there's enough upside down offciating that they won't vote it in due to inconsistencies.....like QB's throwing the ball away under pressure and a white hat saying: "No, he was out of the pocket." Ouch.
I have heard of JV games getting worked with guys and their regular 5 man line-up, but that's rare and I don't see a trend to that. I've never worked a 6 or 7 man, but would be interested in seeing how it worked out. I ump on most Friday night JV/FR games and white hat the rest. TWO...? Are you kidding me...?...and "kidding" is not the word I thought of here.. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11am. |