NFHS Survey up

[KurtBryan]

RichMSN:

I linked the entire article for everybody who has not already read it, and there are only 7 states and D.C. who did not allow it this past season, not 10 as the article incorrectly states.

MORE IMPORTANTLY, Mr. Brad Cashman - Chairman of the NFHS Rules Committee was responding in part to the North Carolina SRI words, NOT MINE...and so the Chairman's direct words and quote carry TREMENDOUS weight because he understands BOTH sides, not just one side or the other. It is clear based on Mr. Cashman's quote the A-11 will not ruin the game in the least.

In fact, there are obviouly a whole lot of people who love the wide open, innovative aspect of the A-11, how it helps smaller teams be slightly more competitive, and all of the variables it offers up.

And now that our teams have played 22 straight games over two years without one of our players suffering a major injury in the A-11, it definitely helps to keep the kids safer too. Very much a strong point indeed.

Happy Holidays,

KB

[JRutledge]

A-11 offense sparks controversy

Here is also a link that clearly shows everyone is not "sold" on the offense.

BTW, both Kurt and I were referenced in this article.

When the A-11 was presented to the rules committee of the National Federation of State High School Associations, it was ruled legal, but not unanimously.

"Some people question whether it's taking advantage of the rule," said Bob Colgate, the federation's assistant director and liaison to the football rules committee. "It is innovative, and [the committee does] respect that, but they also want to make sure that it can be officiated and that it's not making a travesty of the game."

Happy Thanksgiving.

Peace

[KurtBryan]

Again, does the A-11 make a Travesty of the game?......WAS one of the items Reviewed and Discussed BEFORE it was declared Legal and OK to use.

In fact, MANY officials who worked our A-11 games during the past two years have made it clear the A-11 Does NOT, (repeat) does NOT make a Travesty of the game.

Just the opposite, many a Refs said it was keeping them on their toes and quite Refreshing, a challege welcomed.

Now what do you say to Those Officials who have actually worked games where the A-11 was used and to them it was not a big deal and perfectly OK by them???

Happy Thanksgiving too. KB

[Rich]

Originally Posted by KurtBryan

Again, does the A-11 make a Travesty of the game?......WAS one of the items Reviewed and Discussed BEFORE it was declared Legal and OK to use.

In fact, MANY officials who worked our A-11 games during the past two years have made it clear the A-11 Does NOT, (repeat) does NOT make a Travesty of the game.

Just the opposite, many a Refs said it was keeping them on their toes and quite Refreshing, a challege welcomed.

Now what do you say to Those Officials who have actually worked games where the A-11 was used and to them it was not a big deal and perfectly OK by them???

Happy Thanksgiving too. KB

Blah, blah, blah. Only those who share your view have credibility. What's point of anyone saying otherwise, you'll just find people that align with your view.

Before you do this, though, please let us know what the intent and purpose of the numbering exception is and why they call it "scrimmage KICK" formation?

[Robert Goodman]

Originally Posted by RichMSN

Before you do this, though, please let us know what the intent and purpose of the numbering exception is and why they call it "scrimmage KICK" formation?

Same reason "grabbing the face mask" includes grabbing a helmet opening (edge) but is still called (AFAIK) "grabbing the face mask" -- convenience.

What else is Fed surveying for football? I mean what other questions?

Robert

[OverAndBack]

it's "unfair to the defense and cannot be officiated."

Despite all evidence to the contrary.

I'm not a huge fan of it, either, and its originator is a bit full of himself, but, whatever. It takes advantage of a loophole that, like many loopholes, is exploited in a way that the rules book writers didn't intend it to be used. That's, I guess, fair play.

And necessity is the mother of invention, so the small school staying with a bigger school thing, fine. Whatever.

A-11 seems to me to be neither the greatest thing since sliced bread nor the worst thing since socialism. It is what it is until it isn't anymore. But, to me at least, the biggest problem is that it exploits something that exists for a different purpose - not that it can't be defended or officiated, because it's been proven that it can be defended and officiated.

[HLin NC]

They ask about dropping the LOD from OPI, making the previous spot the basic spot for fouls by A behind the previous spot on loose ball and running plays, allowing the team in possession of the ball to choose either the spot where the helmet came off the ball carrier OR replay the down as an option are what I recall.

I can't pull it up to review it now that I've completed it

[waltjp]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

A-11 offense sparks controversy

Here is also a link that clearly shows everyone is not "sold" on the offense.

BTW, both Kurt and I were referenced in this article.



Happy Thanksgiving.

Peace

Hey Jeff, will you sign my A-11 Installation Manual?

[JRutledge]

Anytime.

Just make sure you send me $100 for shipping and handling first.

Peace