The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Football (https://forum.officiating.com/football/)
-   -   Penalty question (https://forum.officiating.com/football/49895-penalty-question.html)

jimpiano Sun Nov 16, 2008 01:08am

Penalty question
 
This is not to dispute a ruling, but to ask for the appropriate rule.

A forward pass is thrown toward a wide receiver near a sideline.
Before the pass gets to the receiver it is tipped by a defender and sails high and uncatchable out of bounds.

A second after the tip and deflection a SECOND receiver, a few yards ahead of the receiver, who makes no attempt to go after the ball, is hit, hemet to helmet by a defender.

15 yard penalty against the defense was the ruling.

What rule covers this?

I thought the officials got it right.

Just would like a rule interpretation.

Robert Goodman Sun Nov 16, 2008 01:15am

Presumably the hit was ruled a personal foul for the type of contact (head to head), or unnecessary roughness for the circumstance of the contact (hitting someone out of play).

Robert

JugglingReferee Sun Nov 16, 2008 07:49am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano (Post 550948)
This is not to dispute a ruling, but to ask for the appropriate rule.

A forward pass is thrown toward a wide receiver near a sideline.
Before the pass gets to the receiver it is tipped by a defender and sails high and uncatchable out of bounds.

A second after the tip and deflection a SECOND receiver, a few yards ahead of the receiver, who makes no attempt to go after the ball, is hit, hemet to helmet by a defender.

15 yard penalty against the defense was the ruling.

What rule covers this?

I thought the officials got it right.

Just would like a rule interpretation.

The common sense rule should apply. Disqualification to this knucklehead.

MJT Sun Nov 16, 2008 02:23pm

Definitely unnecessary roughness. This is a point of emphasis for NF, NCAA, and in the NFL. Those are exactly the types of hits they want called at all levels and are always supported by supervisors.

FeetBallRef Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:32pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JugglingReferee (Post 550952)
The common sense rule should apply. Disqualification to this knucklehead.

This play description appears to be a description of a Illinois DB against a Ohio State receiver. The Ill. coach disagreed with the call.

JR was right, the player should have been ejected but wasn't...

jimpiano Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:39pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by FeetBallRef (Post 551115)
This play description appears to be a description of a Illinois DB against a Ohio State receiver. The Ill. coach disagreed with the call.

JR was right, the player should have been ejected but wasn't...

Yes, that was the play.
I thought the officials made the correct call. In fact the play was so blatant it pratically called itself.

The Sports Editor of the Columbus Dispatch, though, called it the worst call he has seen all year.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1