The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Football (https://forum.officiating.com/football/)
-   -   Rule Question (https://forum.officiating.com/football/49485-rule-question.html)

bcl1127 Thu Oct 23, 2008 09:56am

Rule Question
 
A coach last week was telling me that a Linebacker was pushing the DT into the center and the center could not block him. He said "that's a penalty", I thought about it and did not think it was. Is there something in the Rule book I missed? I re-read some sections after the game and could not find anything like this. Just curious.

Bresquire Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:01am

Sounds like the same thing as a running back pushing his blocker in the back to one way or another. I don't believe there is a rule against this.

Bresquire

ajmc Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:09am

NF: 9.2.3.b (Illegal use of Hands & Holding) "A defensive player shall not (b) use his hands to add momentum to the charge of a teammate who is on the line of scrimmage."

bigjohn Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:11am

I bet no one on this board has ever called that!
:)

waltjp Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:14am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigjohn (Post 545065)
I bet no one on this board has ever called that!
:)

I'll PM you my address so you can send me the check. ;)

bcl1127 Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:58am

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajmc (Post 545061)
NF: 9.2.3.b (Illegal use of Hands & Holding) "A defensive player shall not (b) use his hands to add momentum to the charge of a teammate who is on the line of scrimmage."

Ok, thanks, for some reason, I would never have looked at that particular rule to find this...

Thanks!!!

FTVMartin Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:53pm

I called it last year. A coach was complaining about it and I checked my book at halftime and found it. The only time I've ever seen it.

mbyron Thu Oct 23, 2008 01:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by FTVMartin (Post 545142)
I called it last year. A coach was complaining about it and I checked my book at halftime and found it. The only time I've ever seen it.

It's still in the book. :D

bigjohn Thu Oct 23, 2008 01:23pm

you ever called this one?


ART. 3 . . . The blocker’s hand(s) may not be locked nor may he swing, throw
or flip the elbow or forearm so that it is moving faster than the blocker’s shoulders
at the time the elbow, forearm or shoulder contacts the opponent. The
blocker may not initiate contact with his arm or hand against an opponent above
the opponent’s shoulder, but he may use his hand or arm to break a fall or
maintain his balance.

waltjp Thu Oct 23, 2008 01:27pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigjohn (Post 545151)
you ever called this one?


ART. 3 . . . The blocker’s hand(s) may not be locked nor may he swing, throw
or flip the elbow or forearm so that it is moving faster than the blocker’s shoulders
at the time the elbow, forearm or shoulder contacts the opponent. The
blocker may not initiate contact with his arm or hand against an opponent above
the opponent’s shoulder, but he may use his hand or arm to break a fall or
maintain his balance.

I thought this could have been called against an umpire in a college game last week. :D

bigjohn Thu Oct 23, 2008 01:32pm

He did throw a flipper!

Blue37 Thu Oct 23, 2008 01:33pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigjohn (Post 545151)
you ever called this one?


ART. 3 . . . The blocker’s hand(s) may not be locked nor may he swing, throw
or flip the elbow or forearm so that it is moving faster than the blocker’s shoulders
at the time the elbow, forearm or shoulder contacts the opponent. The
blocker may not initiate contact with his arm or hand against an opponent above
the opponent’s shoulder, but he may use his hand or arm to break a fall or
maintain his balance.

The contact above the shoulder - couple of times a year. The "flipper" as it was called when I played - maybe once every three or four years.

Welpe Thu Oct 23, 2008 02:09pm

I've called contact above the shoulders a couple of times. I don't think I've ever seen a flipper.

At what point would we consider calling one of these a PF for for striking instead of illegal use of the hands?

Also, why is the foul for a defensive player slapping the head of an offensive player specifically enumerated as a PF and not covered under the general "striking" PF?

waltjp Thu Oct 23, 2008 02:36pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welpe (Post 545177)
Also, why is the foul for a defensive player slapping the head of an offensive player specifically enumerated as a PF and not covered under the general "striking" PF?

The head slap was a common defensive technique back in the day. We were taught to slap the blocker in the ear hole.

Robert Goodman Thu Oct 23, 2008 05:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welpe (Post 545177)
I've called contact above the shoulders a couple of times. I don't think I've ever seen a flipper.

Most coaches AFAIK who use the term refer to the "flipper" as the arm held that way, with the hand close to the chest, so that the ulnar surface of the forearm can be used to make contact, regardless of where it lands, not specifically to refer to a blow to the chops. Before the rules on use of the hands were liberalized, the rules really encouraged flipper contact. A player who blocks with the shoulder can use the "flipper" of the same arm to increase the area of contact, or have it free to protect the gap.

Quote:

At what point would we consider calling one of these a PF for for striking instead of illegal use of the hands?
If the ulnar surface of the forearm was used on the neck or chin as a deliberate point of initial contact or if it looked as though it was deliberately slid upward after the intial contact and wound up delivering an intentional or unintentional uppercut -- in other words, more of the time than illegal use of hands would be the only justified call. I could see it being merely illegal use of hands & arms if a rushing defender were using his hand to try to turn the far shoulder of a blocker and in reaching across made inadvertent forearm contact with the neck.

Robert


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1