The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 11, 2008, 11:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 51
There was a sit. last year with these types of questions. It involved the "second block" as described in the case book. An initial hit below the waist is legal, but a second hit is not. Case play 9.3.2 Sit F. The one team I had also delayed the initial hit and then went for the legs, which the one coach did not like, as it was a safety concern for his players. Sometimes they were committing it while the ball was in the ENZ, and most of the time the ball was out, so that was an easy flag. It was the times where the ball stayed in that made things tricky, for they were "going for the knees" for the takedown. How does anyone else feel about that?
__________________
"My purpose on life was to not make people happy, it is to make the correct call!!"
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Free Blocking Zone FATUMP Football 6 Mon Sep 10, 2007 05:52pm
Free blocking zone boone17 Football 10 Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:26pm
Free Blocking Zone and the Shotgun (NFHS) UmpJM Football 16 Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:49pm
Free Blocking zone question verticalStripes Football 1 Tue Sep 20, 2005 07:25pm
Free blocking zone question devilsadvocate Football 3 Sun Oct 13, 2002 08:33pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1