The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Football (https://forum.officiating.com/football/)
-   -   PSU/Purdue Big Ten Officials may be Fired (https://forum.officiating.com/football/39490-psu-purdue-big-ten-officials-may-fired.html)

jimpiano Thu Nov 08, 2007 09:44pm

PSU/Purdue Big Ten Officials may be Fired
 
What calls were involved are not specified but :http://www.sportingnews.com/experts/.../949483-p.html

Sonofanump Thu Nov 08, 2007 09:55pm

I did not see the game, anyone remember any calls that stood out?

TXMike Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:03pm

Tiller puzzled by several calls in loss to Penn State

Associated Press - November 7, 2007

WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. (AP) - Several calls in last week's loss to Penn State left Purdue coach Joe Tiller scratching his head.

Receiver Selwyn Lymon appeared to catch a touchdown pass from Curtis Painter, but it was ruled incomplete. Purdue ended up settling for a field goal.

Lymon also caught a pass and ran out of bounds, but the official kept the clock running. The Boilermakers were forced to call a timeout with 2:10 to play, one they could have used later while trying to drive for a tie.

Tiller says he's talked to the Big Ten office about the calls. But he's watching what he says in public.

He says he finds himself mentally correcting himself and trying to make sure he doesn't say anything inappropriate.

JugglingReferee Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:04pm

It says that the crew is working this weekend, but that the crew will be suspended for games on Nov 17, and some of the crew may be fired?

And they're supposed to work their best this weekend knowing that next weekend they will be suspended and possibly lose their job after that?

There's a great way to boost morale: publicize this crap. Just more proof that other people's dirty laundry belongs nowhere in the public eye.

Why can't this stuff stay private where it belongs?

I, as a member of the public, only care when good things happen to people!

jimpiano Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:15pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JugglingReferee
It says that the crew is working this weekend, but that the crew will be suspended for games on Nov 17, and some of the crew may be fired?

And they're supposed to work their best this weekend knowing that next weekend they will be suspended and possibly lose their job after that?

There's a great way to boost morale: publicize this crap. Just more proof that other people's dirty laundry belongs nowhere in the public eye.

Why can't this stuff stay private where it belongs?

I, as a member of the public, only care when good things happen to people!

And when "bad things" happen you prefer not to know?

TXMike Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:17pm

Worst call I have seen talked about was late in the game a Purdue receiver caught a pass close to the sideline and then stepped out of bounds to stop the clock but covering official would it, apparently ruling "forward progress". I am looking for the video of it.

JugglingReferee Fri Nov 09, 2007 06:38am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
And when "bad things" happen you prefer not to know?

Correct; at least not in this case. It doesn't affect public safety. I don't see what good it does either. How about this:

Does your employer publish a news article when you make a mistake?

reddevil19 Fri Nov 09, 2007 10:41am

Quote:

Originally Posted by TXMike
Worst call I have seen talked about was late in the game a Purdue receiver caught a pass close to the sideline and then stepped out of bounds to stop the clock but covering official would it, apparently ruling "forward progress". I am looking for the video of it.

I saw this play. The receiver did not run out of bounds forwards. He caught the ball coming back and went out of bounds running backwards. Doesn't the clock continue to run if you go out of bounds backwards?

Kirby Fri Nov 09, 2007 10:45am

Not if the player goes out of bounds on his own with no contact from a defensive player.

jimpiano Fri Nov 09, 2007 10:50am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JugglingReferee
Correct; at least not in this case. It doesn't affect public safety. I don't see what good it does either. How about this:

Does your employer publish a news article when you make a mistake?

You are going to have to come to grips with the fact that officials' mistakes happen in front of millions of people. The integrity of the sport depends on players and fans knowing the officials are the best the league can employ.

A coach with a losing record is also no threat to public safety, but when he gets fired it usually is published and broadcast to the world.

reddevil19 Fri Nov 09, 2007 10:51am

That was my original thought. But the official seemed so sure of himself on the call that I figured he must be right and Tiller just had an awesomely bad brain-cramp on the rule.

This being the case, that seems like a very, very bad error on the part of the official.

JugglingReferee Fri Nov 09, 2007 11:27am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
You are going to have to come to grips with the fact that officials' mistakes happen in front of millions of people. The integrity of the sport depends on players and fans knowing the officials are the best the league can employ.

A coach with a losing record is also no threat to public safety, but when he gets fired it usually is published and broadcast to the world.

Ya thanks bud. Thanks for explaining it to me. :rolleyes:

PSU213 Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:19pm

I had a varsity game on Sat. so I was forced to watch the game on tape. First let me say--Joe Tiller has a history of whining big time (almost to the level of Joe Paterno!), so I would take what he says with a grain of salt.

The potential TD (ruled incomplete) that was mentioned looked like a TD to me on replay. It was never reviewed by the booth (plus Purdue has a challange at their disposal). ESPN only showed 1 or 2 replays on TV, but I feel it was fair to say that it could have gone either way.

As for the foward progress situation...here the officials were 100% correct. A5 catches the ball while moving back toward the original LOS. Gets 1 or 2 feet inbounds, steps OOB about 2 yards back (toward the LOS) from where A5 first touched the ball. Textbook case of forward progress ending in bounds. LJ correctly spots where he completed the catch (i.e. first touched the ground with the ball) and winds the clock. The TV guys on ESPN said the call was terrible, said it needed to be looked at upstairs, and went so far as to call the LJ by name (a point that really ticked me off considering he made the right call...but then again, they were interested in hearing themselves talk and creating some sort of controversy...plus Andre Ware knows everything, ha!).

Texas Aggie Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:56pm

Quote:

A5 catches the ball while moving back toward the original LOS. Gets 1 or 2 feet inbounds, steps OOB about 2 yards back (toward the LOS) from where A5 first touched the ball. Textbook case of forward progress ending in bounds. LJ correctly spots where he completed the catch (i.e. first touched the ground with the ball) and winds the clock.
From this description, that's not forward progress if he's "moving back toward the LOS". The ball should be spotted where he stepped out of bounds, not where you say his forward progress was if he wasn't forced back by a defender. Thus, he went out of bounds on his own, and the clock should be stopped.

TXMike Fri Nov 09, 2007 01:40pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by PSU213
I had a varsity game on Sat. so I was forced to watch the game on tape. First let me say--Joe Tiller has a history of whining big time (almost to the level of Joe Paterno!), so I would take what he says with a grain of salt.

The potential TD (ruled incomplete) that was mentioned looked like a TD to me on replay. It was never reviewed by the booth (plus Purdue has a challange at their disposal). ESPN only showed 1 or 2 replays on TV, but I feel it was fair to say that it could have gone either way.

As for the foward progress situation...here the officials were 100% correct. A5 catches the ball while moving back toward the original LOS. Gets 1 or 2 feet inbounds, steps OOB about 2 yards back (toward the LOS) from where A5 first touched the ball. Textbook case of forward progress ending in bounds. LJ correctly spots where he completed the catch (i.e. first touched the ground with the ball) and winds the clock. The TV guys on ESPN said the call was terrible, said it needed to be looked at upstairs, and went so far as to call the LJ by name (a point that really ticked me off considering he made the right call...but then again, they were interested in hearing themselves talk and creating some sort of controversy...plus Andre Ware knows everything, ha!).

Wha choo talking 'bout Willis???

That is not the NCAA ruling (don't have a clue about Fed) No contact caused him to go backwards, no forward progress.

Kirby Fri Nov 09, 2007 05:30pm

TXMike,

That would not be a FED ruling either.

jimpiano Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:12am

Quote:

Originally Posted by PSU213
I had a varsity game on Sat. so I was forced to watch the game on tape. First let me say--Joe Tiller has a history of whining big time (almost to the level of Joe Paterno!), so I would take what he says with a grain of salt.

The potential TD (ruled incomplete) that was mentioned looked like a TD to me on replay. It was never reviewed by the booth (plus Purdue has a challange at their disposal). ESPN only showed 1 or 2 replays on TV, but I feel it was fair to say that it could have gone either way.

As for the foward progress situation...here the officials were 100% correct. A5 catches the ball while moving back toward the original LOS. Gets 1 or 2 feet inbounds, steps OOB about 2 yards back (toward the LOS) from where A5 first touched the ball. Textbook case of forward progress ending in bounds. LJ correctly spots where he completed the catch (i.e. first touched the ground with the ball) and winds the clock. The TV guys on ESPN said the call was terrible, said it needed to be looked at upstairs, and went so far as to call the LJ by name (a point that really ticked me off considering he made the right call...but then again, they were interested in hearing themselves talk and creating some sort of controversy...plus Andre Ware knows everything, ha!).

Maybe you could give us a rule citation(NCAA) that would support you on why the clock should not have been stopped?

jimpiano Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:46am

Quote:

Originally Posted by GarthB
That has nothing to do with the idiotic practice of publicly notifying a crew that they will all be suspended and some fired and then sending them out expecting them to do a great job with teams, coaches and fans all knowing the details.

They either should have waited to announce the punishments or suspended them immediately.

And they sent the crew to the Ohio State-Illinois game. At least they went to a game that meant nothing, eh?

TXMike Sun Nov 11, 2007 07:53am

Quote:

Originally Posted by GarthB
That has nothing to do with the idiotic practice of publicly notifying a crew that they will all be suspended and some fired and then sending them out expecting them to do a great job with teams, coaches and fans all knowing the details.

They either should have waited to announce the punishments or suspended them immediately.


I don't think the punishments were "announced" but rather "leaked". Huge difference!! It would be great if the leaker could be found and dealt with but we need to be clear that the conference did not put this info out there. I don't think any major conference would be that ignorant to announce a suspension and trhen send the same guys to one of the biggest games the conference has that year.

johnSandlin Sun Nov 11, 2007 09:02am

I agree with comment that was posted about officials making mistakes, and you need to move on.

However, two of the officials on the crew in question have struggled the past few years in the Big Ten.

This crew worked the Michigan/Minnesota game this year and there were a couple of things that I noticed in that game that got both coaches kinda bothered.

I also noticed a couple of things yesterday during the Ohio State/Illinois game they were doing that made me wonder at times.

OverAndBack Mon Nov 12, 2007 07:41pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JugglingReferee
Does your employer publish a news article when you make a mistake?

80,000 people don't normally watch me work live, with hundreds of thousands more watching live on TV, with tons of actual money wagered (legally or illegally) on my work product.

Sad but true. Any analogies of jobs in the "real world" to officiating really don't hold water.

JugglingReferee Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by OverAndBack
80,000 people don't normally watch me work live, with hundreds of thousands more watching live on TV, with tons of actual money wagered (legally or illegally) on my work product.

Sad but true. Any analogies of jobs in the "real world" to officiating really don't hold water.

In the corporate world, performance is the only thing that matters. If I don't perform, I am axed. However, before that happens, there is not a notice sent to 1 million shareholders. :rolleyes:

I can't imagine that employee morale stays up if 500,000 shareholders are told that Mr. John Doe from the Springfield, MO facility will be fired unless he meets the next quarterly goal.

JMHO.

schmitty1973 Tue Nov 13, 2007 04:00pm

Is this the same crew that also worked the Illinois/Michigan game?

johnSandlin Tue Nov 13, 2007 04:40pm

No. I watched that game and it is not the same crew.

Sonofanump Tue Nov 13, 2007 09:32pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
And they sent the crew to the Ohio State-Illinois game. At least they went to a game that meant nothing, eh?

There was a fumble on a long run in the first quarter that was ruled down. Apparently replay was not working (technical difficulties) and the call was not overturned. I thought that I heard a whistle before the OSU defender recovered the "fumble".

jimpiano Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:22am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sonofanump
There was a fumble on a long run in the first quarter that was ruled down. Apparently replay was not working (technical difficulties) and the call was not overturned. I thought that I heard a whistle before the OSU defender recovered the "fumble".

Look. No one from OSU is arguing that the call had anything to do with the outcome of the game.

Yet a couple of questions beg to be asked.

How could officials at the highest level of college football blow such an
obvious call?

But more important, if instant replay is supposed to make sure the calls are correct how did it fail to do so in this case? (and scores of others over the last few years)

If instant replay is not one hundred per cent fool proof why have it at all?

jack015 Wed Nov 14, 2007 09:23am

Quote:

Originally Posted by schmitty1973
Is this the same crew that also worked the Illinois/Michigan game?

Comparing the box score from PSU/Perdue and Ill/O. St, only the umpire in the Ill/O. St game was not in the PSU/Perdue game.

Sonofanump Wed Nov 14, 2007 09:39am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jack015
Comparing the box score from PSU/Perdue and Ill/O. St, only the umpire in the Ill/O. St game was not in the PSU/Perdue game.

Great to heard that. Good official, good man. I did not think that any of the questionable calls in the OSU/ILL game involved him.

Bob M. Wed Nov 14, 2007 02:28pm

REPLY: The same would be true in Federation. Forward progress can only be ruled when a player's movement toward his opponent's goal line is involuntarily stopped by an opponnent. Going backward of one's own volition is never reason to blow the ball dead or award progress in advance of the dead ball spot. Clock should have stopped in the PSU/Purdue game.

Niner Wed Nov 14, 2007 08:45pm

Everyone here in Illinois thinks they finally got the good end of blown calls.

BktBallRef Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:48pm

Only 3 flags in the OSU-Illnois game? WOW!

tjones1 Thu Nov 15, 2007 12:13am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niner
Everyone here in Illinois thinks they finally got the good end of blown calls.

Speak for yourself...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1