![]() |
Offensive Linemen Numbering Requirements
Had a discussion this weekend where we had an interior lineman with the number 90 and the TE with the number 57. Someone indicated this was an illegal formation. This team never passed the ball and we always had at least five on the line numbered 50 - 79. Is there a problem with an interior lineman wearing 90? What if number 57 lined up out wide but never went out for a pass, any problems?
|
Quote:
--5 on the line numbered 50-79 --Players are restricted by number and/or position. 57 is ineligible by number. 90, as an interior lineman, is ineligible by position. |
Its not an illegal formation for numbering because they have at least 5 on the line numbered 50-79. It doesn't matter where they're lined up, as long as they have 5 inelligible #'s on the line.
In the second scenario, #57 is inelligible by #, regardless of formation, and cannot go out for a pass. If he does you should have a flag on any pass that is beyond the LOS. And 90 is inelligible by formation if he's covered |
Canadian Ruling
Quote:
Ineligibles are 40-69. We also require 5 ineligibles on the line. They can numbered outside of 40-69, but must report to the Referee first. Eligible by position within 40-69 must also report if they wish to be eligible to catch a pass. |
Quote:
I had a frustrating time Friday night when the visiting coach asked me about using a lineman in the backfield. He first asked if the player could change jerseys offense/defense. I asked the coach if #62 ever went downfield on a passing play or received a pass himself. The coach laughed and said no, never. I told him to keep 62 in #62, then. No rules were being broken. First series, the home coach is screaming about 62 in the backfield, so I slide over on the first COP. I listened to the coach and then told him the rule. He then mentioned that at least 5 crews told him his #54 couldn't line up in the backfield and one crew (the first week) even flagged him for it. Sigh. I wrote a letter to the league commissioner and encouraged him to pass it to the state office so that it can be included in a future bulletin. But for varsity crews to think a Sunday rule is a Friday rule is just inexcusable. |
inexcusable - that's a very kind way of putting it. :)
|
Quote:
In Canada, you can wear whatever # you like, but in some cases you might have to report. |
NCAA appears to be the same as Fed. Simple: 5 (minimum) on the line of 50-79, and all are ineligible regardless of where they line up.
Had a pass completed to 69 last night. What's the foul and penalty? |
Quote:
Penalty is 5yds + LOD Enforcement Depends on where the touching occured. Beyond LOS - Enforce from Previous Spot Behind LOS - Enforce from Spot of Touching (All-but-One) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Robert |
Quote:
Nebraska has said in the meetings they encourage the schools to follow the rule for sub-varsity games, but tell the officials don't make a big deal out of it at that level as long as the coach notifies us before the game. We always try to notify the opposing coach in some manner. Some are usually like, ok, whatever, although we've had a handful here who screams for a flag even though they've been notified ahead of time. It just sickens me the sub-varsity guys are NOT required to go to the rules meetings like the varsity head coaches and the officials. :rolleyes: |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17am. |