The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 20, 2007, 08:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 147
It took me a little time to adopt this sort of "selective" foul calling. It makes sense if you view to role of the official as a game manager and not a rules enforcer.

The reason holding is an issue (when not a safety factor as in a takedown sort of hold) is that the holer is putting the holdee at a disadvantage. If the holdee was not anywhere near the play and thus not a factor to effect the outcome, does the hold really matter?

Its the same way with DPI away from the catch. We are now instructed (by NFHS in the rule and case books) not to flag DPI that is clearly away from the reciever catching the pass.

Its tough and it takes getting used to not calling something obvious...espically when a coach is all up on you for "missing" the obvious hold that everyone saw. But, like I said, after a lot of mental debate and discussions with other officials...I think it really is a good thing for the game.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Libero attack / attack over the net DaveASA/FED Volleyball 2 Fri Oct 13, 2006 08:03am
(NCAA) Holding or not holding? voiceoflg Football 12 Sun Sep 24, 2006 08:59pm
Backrow Attack Teigan Volleyball 1 Tue Feb 14, 2006 10:28am
Back Row Attack equals Panic Attack!! rainmaker Volleyball 4 Thu Sep 04, 2003 01:31am
Umpire under "ATTACK"..... Rog Baseball 2 Thu Dec 06, 2001 05:56pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1