The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 02, 2007, 12:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 44
Touchback or Down on 1

I'm a new basketball ref, and my friends think that because I'm a ref, I know football too. They posed this question to me, and I said that I didn't know the answer, but I knew some guys who could tell me the correct answer. Thanks in advance. Here's the situation: Defender intersepts in their own endzone. The intended receiver immediately tackels the defender with the ball, and in the process, he is pushed across the goalline and falls at the 1 yard line. Does he get his forward progress to the 1, or is it a touchback to the 20?
__________________
Sorry, no signature.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 02, 2007, 01:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 379
Quote:
Originally Posted by KCRef
I'm a new basketball ref, and my friends think that because I'm a ref, I know football too. They posed this question to me, and I said that I didn't know the answer, but I knew some guys who could tell me the correct answer. Thanks in advance. Here's the situation: Defender intersepts in their own endzone. The intended receiver immediately tackels the defender with the ball, and in the process, he is pushed across the goalline and falls at the 1 yard line. Does he get his forward progress to the 1, or is it a touchback to the 20?
We've debated this play a few times on here. I have him down on the 1.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 02, 2007, 01:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maryland by way of Arkansas
Posts: 68
I believe you are correct. If the ball gets completely out of the endzone you have to give him his forward progress at the 1.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 03, 2007, 12:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 110
Just so I understand this and I am going to use an extreme case to make the point...

Defender intercepts the ball 5 yards deep in the endzone. The WR rather than tackle the defender picks him up and carries him out of the endzone droppping the defender on the 1.

Would you really call this play down on the 1 if the defender was making no effort to leave the endzone?

Just curious.

I had a play like this happen in a game this year. We called a touchback, because the defender was not attempting to advance the tackle was initiated in the endzone and was completed on the one.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 03, 2007, 12:14am
MJT MJT is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Alton, Iowa
Posts: 1,796
I would think this would be similar to a play where the receiver catches the ball while in the air in the EZ, gets hit and driven back to the 1 yard line. The ruling in this play is if he downed immediately, it is a TD, BUT if he comes down on his feet and continues to fight or run, then down at the one.
Thus, I would say if he goes down on the hit, TB, but if stays on feet, it would be the spot of his forward most progress. So, in your play, he went down at the one, so TB.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 03, 2007, 09:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Newport, KY
Posts: 176
I think that if the B player makes no effort to advance the ball, and the force of A's tackle moves him forward out of the endzone, I would still rule a touchback. I don't think it would be wise or fair to spot the ball at the 1, effectively taking away 19 yards of turf following a good defensive play.

The questions would then follow about review. Under NCAA or NFL is this spot subject to review? What crieria would used to determine if the spot is correct or not?
__________________
Rick
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 03, 2007, 09:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 379
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJT
Thus, I would say if he goes down on the hit, TB, but if stays on feet, it would be the spot of his forward most progress. So, in your play, he went down at the one, so TB.
But his forward most progress IS the 1.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 03, 2007, 09:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maryland by way of Arkansas
Posts: 68
Ok...we should get this clear. I don't have a Fed book with me, but I do have the NCAA book. Rule 8-6 discusses Touchbacks. Rule 8-6-1 says that it is a touchback if the ball "...becomes dead in the possession of a
player on, above or behind his own goal line and the attacking team is
responsible for the ball being there". Also, approved ruling 8-6-1-II states "The ball is not automatically dead when intercepted. However, if in the judgment of the official there is perceptible time during which the Team B player made no attempt to advance after the interception, declaring a touchback is justified." I think this gives us the wiggle room we need to justify calling a TB on the play you describe.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 03, 2007, 07:22pm
MJT MJT is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Alton, Iowa
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewMcCarthy
But his forward most progress IS the 1.
I see the confusion on what I said, but I meant his progress on "his own accord" not the opponent hitting him. The above AR hits what I was getting at.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 03, 2007, 08:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewMcCarthy
But his forward most progress IS the 1.
Is there such a thing as BACKWARD PROGRESS?

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 04, 2007, 03:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 4,801
Question

Could an argument be made that, since the succeeding spot would be the 20 yard line in case of a touchback, the 20-yard line is, in fact, the forward-most progress?
__________________
"To win the game is great. To play the game is greater. But to love the game is the greatest of all."
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 04, 2007, 05:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 379
I always ask myself- where was the ball is when it became dead?

Per NF rules the ball becomes dead when "a runner is held so his forward progress is stopped."

Forward progress is defined as "the end of advancement of the ball in a runner’s possession... toward the opponent’s goal and determines the dead-ball spot."

From this I believe you have to give them the ball at the 1. The rules do not include any type of special exception for this play.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 04, 2007, 06:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: N.D.
Posts: 1,829
My exception is common sense. If he made no effort to leave the EZ, I have a TB. I see this as no different than a runner on a scrimmage play advancing from his EZ to the 1 and then being pushed back into the EZ. He didn't cause the ball to go back into the EZ, so there is not safety, and, in the above-mentioned play, the player who intercepted the ball did not cause the ball to leave the EZ. TB
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 04, 2007, 10:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 379
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forksref
My exception is common sense. If he made no effort to leave the EZ, I have a TB. I see this as no different than a runner on a scrimmage play advancing from his EZ to the 1 and then being pushed back into the EZ. He didn't cause the ball to go back into the EZ, so there is not safety, and, in the above-mentioned play, the player who intercepted the ball did not cause the ball to leave the EZ. TB
The key difference being that your ruling in your play is backed up by the rules while your ruling on the play above is not. On your play a live ball never went back into the end zone because it became dead when his forward progress was stopped at the 1.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 05, 2007, 07:41pm
(Something hilarious)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: These United States
Posts: 1,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forksref
If he made no effort to leave the EZ,
This is a dangerous, and misleading, rule-wise, statement, when talking about the endzone and getting out of it, in my experience. I once heard a long-time varsity-level umpire make a statement on a runner making "effort to leave the end zone" related to whether or not he was going to call a safety on that player if they were then downed in the end zone.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewMcCarthy
I always ask myself- where was the ball is when it became dead?

Per NF rules the ball becomes dead when "a runner is held so his forward progress is stopped."

Forward progress is defined as "the end of advancement of the ball in a runner’s possession... toward the opponent’s goal and determines the dead-ball spot."

From this I believe you have to give them the ball at the 1.
Agreed.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Touchback fonzzy07 Football 1 Sun Dec 03, 2006 03:31pm
Touchback or 1st down? wh52 Football 6 Sun Jan 22, 2006 12:01am
Touchback? bellsjc Football 3 Mon Sep 19, 2005 03:10pm
Is it a touchback?? wallrhut Football 4 Tue Oct 19, 2004 01:50am
Touchback....or not Patton Football 10 Tue Oct 14, 2003 08:00pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1