OK, what are . . .
 

. . . your three least favorite "National Federation of High Schools" rules? (shamelessly stolen from the baseball forum)

If you'd like, list the rule and why you do not like it.

Sideline Rule - Before this rule I was able to manage the sideline just fine. Now I have to spend way too much time making sure that the coaches comply with the rule, which takes my attention away from the field. As long as they keep out of my way, I don't really care how many coaches are in the box.

Just wait until you have a collision with who is out of the way. A turnover going the other way and now these coaches are in the way but don't realize it and neither do you until you run into them. Had they been back before the play began you wouldn't have to worry about them. A coach in Texas is now disabled due to that and a lawsuit is currently in the courts because of that collision.

As I said, I never had a problem before this rule was added. I kept the coaches back and had no problems. Coaches never were allowed on the field before this rule so I don't see a saftey advantage.

I don't know the specifics of the case in Texas but if he was on the playing field when he was hit, this rule didn't help him. If he was in the coaches box when he was hit, this rule didn't help him either so I don't see how that point is valid.

The coaches box in Texas is 6 ft from the sideline. The area in front of the coaches box is restricted area and that is where the coach was. If we are not enforcing the rule then we are liable. I do understand though that the NF rules may be different in regards to a coaching box in comparison to NCAA rules. I was just posting that we must keep the coaches back and enforce whatever the rule for whatever level we work due to safety to not only us, but to players and coaches as well.

Jason, we aren't liable in a legal sense if someone gets injured, unless we are (probably grossly) negligent. You almost have to tell a coach something like, "stand here, and you won't get hurt; I promise" to be held negligent. The problem with someone asserting you didn't enforce a rule is, how do you define "enforce?" Is telling them once to get back enough? Do you have to physically push them back, and if so, every time they come out? Do you have to throw sideline warning, then infraction, flags on EVERY play they don't stay back on? Are they OK coming out on plays that don't end on their sideline?

There's a thousand questions to answer just like that. The bottom line is take care of business. If you need to warn, warn. If you need to flag, for either a warning or later for a foul, do so. But if a coach thinks they can sue an official for not enforcing a rule that coach broke, then they're crazy. That suit won't go anywhere in Texas.

1. No uncatchable pass rule - Please put this in once and for all. We can handle more judgement calls. Its ok. We're pretty good at what we do.

2. NFHS Touchback rules. Let's change this to match the NCAA rule. Long kick returns are exciting and can swing momentum of a game. Let em run it back.

3. Timing rules. Let's start the clock on change of posessions (when its logical to start the clock, not like NCAA) except in the last say 4 minutes of a half.

Just my 2 cents...i'm sure there are others.

1. Offensive Pass Interference: change to either 5 yards and loss of down from the previous spot or 15 yards and repeat down from previous spot

2. Defensive Encroachment: Allow the defense to get back onsides. (if they jump they can get back)

3. Person Foul or Unsportsmanlike Foul on team being scored on: The scoring team should be allowed to take the enforcement of the yardage either on the PAT (as it is now) or on the following kickoff/free kick.

I agree. Perhaps using the word liable wasn't what I intended. What I meant was I have seen officials do nothing with the sideline. They don't tell the coach anything. No warning, no nothing. Then when they turn up the field and run right into the coach in the 4th Qtr the flag comes flying. Heck the coach has been there all night. Like you said, a warning or a flag for an official warning but don't wait till the 4th Qtr to decide to clean it up. Get it cleaned up in the 1st Qtr.

I agree with some of what was said.oo

OPI should only be 5 yards and loss of down. As written now, this penality is a drive killer.

Allow for catchability to be a consideration in DPI. We are expected to only call fouls that effect the play, but catchability of a ball isn't a consideration in calling DPI.

Make breaking the huddle with more than 11 a penality. All coaches (and a lot of officials) already think this is a rule...just change it to end the debate over the issue.

Why should the penalty for OPI be less severe for A, than DPI is for B?

15 yards & Loss of Down or 15 yards & Auto 1st Down is more fair than in NCAA or NFL. Do you also think DPI should be 5 yards and a 1st down?

I would like to see pass interference against the defense penalized as follows:

If penalty is less than 15 yards downfield enforcement at the spot of the foul automatic 1st down for the offense.

If the penalty is more than 15 yards down field then 15 yards from the previous spot and automatic 1st down for the offense.

If the penalty happens inside of the 15 yard line or in the endzone of the defensive team spot foul (in endzone 2 yard line) and automatic first down.

OK, here's mine.

1) A runner who has crossed the NZ and returns to throw a forward pass.

2) Catchability of a pass not being a factor in DPI/OPI

3) A scrimmage kick that touches the ground (or player) beyond the NZ and returns behind the NZ and is remains in play if recovered by team-A

and one more for good luck

4) An illegal kick made from beyond the NZ (or the unlikely "return kick") remains a live ball.

What are who gonna do with these?

1) Have the field marked so that there is the two yard NO MANS LAND in front of the coaches box. We finally got the chain crew back, so let's keep the coaches back behind them. If the stadium is too narrow, then so be it. But, make it mandatory on fields that are wide enough to accomodate it. It works for NCAA, so why not for FED?

2) Uncatchable pass.

I'm not a lawyer so I'm speculating on what I've heard in other cases. If there is evidence that a coach is on the field often during the game and you do nothing about it and later that coach is injured while being in that position, you could be found negligent for not enforcing the rules. It's not different than being aware of a player using illegal equipment (coach's liability) or the band being too close to the field and getting hit. It's a scary part of our job that most people don't know enough about.

1. Dead End zones

2. Timing rules

#3 has already been fixed--PSK

#1 - Kicks into the end-zone are dead. I can't tell you how many times we had games where one side has a kicker that puts it in every time. zzzzzz.

#2 - PI even on uncatchable balls. Like someone else said, is there some advantage gained here?

#3 - Defensive encroachment with no ball snap. Again, if they can get back before the snap, what advantage has been gained? And if they can't get back, we have a live ball foul giving the offense a chance to do something.

REPLY: I like what many of the other posters have said. I'll add one...

Get rid of 7-1-7b ("Any act is clearly intended to cause B to encroach.")as a criteria for determining a false start. 7-1-7a and 7-1-7c are more than adequate for objectively determining whether or not a false start has occurred. 7-1-7b adds subjectivity and mindreading into the equation.

I know some will disagree, but I've heard officials use this reason for calling a false start when the QB uses a hard count, or when Team A goes on the second count in a 3-and-short situation near the end of the game when they had been going on the first count all night prior to that. Same for when a team whose linemen have been going from a two point stance in punting situations throughout the game, now go smoothly to a three point stance late in the game and the defense reacts.

I've seen people do this many times before but on a 4th down when it looks like they are going for it.

Although it's different cuz the lineman snap down into a 3 pt stance from a 2 point and the backs and ends shift at the same time and the qb shifts into a shotgun.

This normally causes the defense to encroach and encroachment gets called every time against the defense.

IMO, NCAA is most fair cuz 15 yards and LOD is more of a "double wammy" than the 15 yards and automatic 1st down, cuz the 15 yards for DPI will most always result in a 1st down anyway. The LOD will mean an almost certan punt upcoming. They do not seem very even IMO.

NCAA, DPI is spot foul if less than 15, and 15 of more than 15 and first down.
OPI is 15 and NO LOD.