Pac-10 officials vs. OK suspended one game

[OklahomaBlue]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Learn to comprehend what you read. I do not think he was saying Bomar was at the game. He was saying that you lost Bomar because he was violating NCAA rules.

Peace

His comment was to say the least Vague... And I don't need you to tell me that I need to learn to comprehend what I read... You don't know what he meant... Try not to be discourteous. It doesn't become you...

[Texas Aggie]

Sorry, blue, but your response indicated you didn't get it. He was saying that if Bomar hadn't screwed up, not been suspended, and actually played, OU would have won by 20 or whatever. That's an arguable point, of course, but I think he knew who played QB for OU at Oregon.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by OklahomaBlue

His comment was to say the least Vague... And I don't need you to tell me that I need to learn to comprehend what I read... You don't know what he meant... Try not to be discourteous. It doesn't become you...

I think I do know what he meant. As Texas Aggie pointed out, you missed the point (now this is my opinion).

Peace

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by OklahomaBlue

His comment was to say the least Vague... And I don't need you to tell me that I need to learn to comprehend what I read... You don't know what he meant... Try not to be discourteous. It doesn't become you...

I have not to do with football officiating, but how can someone (you) who told someone (RonRef) "your statement and question is totally stupid!!!" then turn around and complain about someone else (JRutledge) be discourteous?

Totally defies logic.

[edman42]

http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/h...ves/106954.asp