|
Wed Sep 14, 2005, 10:53am
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would love to discuss them with you, but they don't let us keep the part 2 question sheet and we turn in our answer sheet for our grade.
__________________
See the ball, insure its dead Then the whistle, not ahead 
|
|
Wed Sep 14, 2005, 03:22pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
that is retarded that they don't let you keep you question sheet. How are you supposed to study other than just reading the book?
__________________
"Contact does not mean a foul, a foul means contact." -Me
|
|
Thu Sep 15, 2005, 05:40am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Thu Sep 15, 2005, 03:01pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll weigh in on #3. Remember that any ball going into an endzone requires you to know what force caused it to enter the endzone. The question says that R muffed the ball. By rule definition a muff does not cause a new force. Therefore, the force putting the ball in the endzone is the kick and all kicks into the endzone in NFHS rules is a touchback.
__________________
"I love it when they boo!"
|
|
Thu Sep 15, 2005, 03:17pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok, I admit that I just got sucker punched. I fell for the oldest trick in the test book. As a lawyer I was trained many years ago to RTFQ!!!! The way question #3 is written (not the way I read it) it would be a safety scored against K.
__________________
"I love it when they boo!"
|
|
Thu Sep 15, 2005, 03:34pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
How many of you think that the test writer needs to brush up on his rules. In question 90, there is an ineligible A player downfield. Says that this penalty involves a loss of down -- not for the past few years it doesn't.
__________________
"I love it when they boo!"
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
