|
|
|
Mon Oct 18, 2004, 06:14pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Again, I guess I am looking at "an extended arm and locked" elbow as the reasoning behind the difference between a slap to the helmet (9-5) and adding a flagrancy violation on top. This official determined that because it met this criteria that it constituted flagrancy and DQ. Where is this definition is all that I am asking? If it does not exist, then does it not stand to reason that this is a misapplication of a rule that does not exist?
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
