The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 23, 2004, 02:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 265
2nd and 5 for A. During the dead ball period, B commits and USC and then A commits an USC. Since B's USC was first, would A be awarded a new series because of B's penalty occuring first?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 23, 2004, 02:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cheyenne, wyoming
Posts: 1,493
yes that is how it would occur and it would be a first down for A...that is assuming there are no half the distance issues etc....
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 23, 2004, 06:09pm
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Lightbulb Canadian Ruling

These offset. Downs continue as normal.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 24, 2004, 09:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,557
Quote:
Originally posted by cmathews
yes that is how it would occur and it would be a first down for A...that is assuming there are no half the distance issues etc....
This is correct for NFHS but I believe NCAA is different.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 24, 2004, 10:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 63
Send a message via MSN to MI Official Send a message via Skype™ to MI Official
Would it be 15 on B signal 1st down, then March on A and then first and 25???
__________________
That looked just ugly enough to be legal.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 24, 2004, 10:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by MI Official
Would it be 15 on B signal 1st down, then March on A and then first and 25???
I think that depends if you have blown RFP or not.

Am I correct in assuming that you can have simultaneous US and therefore both would offset - but if there is truly a sequence of two separate US - then you would have 1st and 10.

Correct?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 24, 2004, 10:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
NCAA, I'm offsetting these as written. The events would have to be unrelated, and separated by some time (like - I signaled 1 and started walking it off before the other occured), for me to make this 2 separate walk-offs.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 24, 2004, 11:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Mullica Hill, NJ
Posts: 798
It's first and 10 for A. The ONLY way it could be 1st and 25 (as was noted) is if the RFP has been given BEFORE team A committed their USC.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 24, 2004, 11:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2
Wouldnt you enforce each penalty in order of occurance?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 24, 2004, 01:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,557
Quote:
Originally posted by anspach21
Wouldnt you enforce each penalty in order of occurance?
Um, yes.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 01, 2004, 08:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 37
Quote:
Originally posted by Patton
2nd and 5 for A. During the dead ball period, B commits and USC and then A commits an USC. Since B's USC was first, would A be awarded a new series because of B's penalty occuring first?
Sorry, guys, but I've got something different than the rest of you (speaking in NFHS here). For a sense of simplicity, I'm going to assume that there are no half-the-distance enforcements on this one, in which case I've got 2nd and 5 for A. If there is no "order of occurance", then they offset and you stay put. Even if there is an order, the technically correct thing to do is to march off 15 yards in one direction and then 15 back the other way which puts in where you started, 2nd and 5. No automatic 1st down.

Jonathan
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 01, 2004, 09:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cheyenne, wyoming
Posts: 1,493
Jransom,
Anytime a ball is dead in A's possesion, in advance of the line to gain, after all live ball fouls have been considered, it is a first down. When you march of the 15 yards against B you are in advance of the LTG and therefore A has a first down. Now you march the 15 off against A reset the chains and it is 1st and 10 for A at the spot we started from..
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 01, 2004, 09:17am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 1,319
Quote:
Originally posted by jransom
Quote:
Originally posted by Patton
2nd and 5 for A. During the dead ball period, B commits and USC and then A commits an USC. Since B's USC was first, would A be awarded a new series because of B's penalty occuring first?
Sorry, guys, but I've got something different than the rest of you (speaking in NFHS here). For a sense of simplicity, I'm going to assume that there are no half-the-distance enforcements on this one, in which case I've got 2nd and 5 for A. If there is no "order of occurance", then they offset and you stay put. Even if there is an order, the technically correct thing to do is to march off 15 yards in one direction and then 15 back the other way which puts in where you started, 2nd and 5. No automatic 1st down.

Jonathan
A new series is awared after any 1st, 2nd, or 3rd down after considering the effect of any act during the down and any dead ball foul by B.

B fouled first. We factor this in and award A the new series. We then consider A's act, penalize it, and then the chains are set.
__________________
Mike Sears
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 02, 2004, 03:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 37
Thumbs up Good Job

Good posts, sears & mathews. I found the rule on awarding a new series and I get it. 5-1-2a and 5-2-3

Let's make sure everyone who read this thread understands this (including me ). By the way, that editorial change "dead-ball foul by B" was just added this year, so I don't understand why there's no updated case play (unless I overlooked).

Situation: 2nd & 3 at A's 24. A21 runs for a gain of 6 and then A67 piles on.
My understanding: Because the LTG was reached by live-ball action, A will be awarded a new series. Since the dead-ball foul by A occurred prior to the RFP, the chains will not be set until after penalty administration. 1st & 10 at A's 15.

Anybody agree or disagree?

Jonathan
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 02, 2004, 10:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Alexandria, LA
Posts: 175
Agreed

But be ready to explain that one to the defensive coach, because he will surely want to know why you are screwing him.
__________________
CW4 Paul Gilmore
Installation Food Advisor
Camp Beauregard
Alexandria, LA
Louisiana NG
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:27pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1