The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 12, 2004, 12:18am
Never Stop Learning
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 518
Have a question on a situation we had tonight. After a play we had a double personal foul dead ball. There was 24 seconds left in the game both players were ejected. The clock was started on the ready for play and it ran out without a play being run. In the NFHS book in Rule 3-3 Art3 it states that a period must be extended with an untimed down if during the last timed down of the period a penalty is accepted. Are these penalties considered to be during a timed down and did we need to run a play or not?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 12, 2004, 12:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 108
No untimed down necessary in your example because they are deadball fouls. . Only replay the down if a liveball foul is accepted. 2 exapmles: 1st example: A's ball with clock running with 5 seconds left in first half, A false starts and B accepts. After measurement clock starts on the ready. Time expires before the snap. No untimed down. 2nd example A illegal shift with 10 second left and the clock running. A1 is tackled with 5 seconds to go in 1st half. B accepts.clock starts on the ready. If time expires before A snaps, an untimed down must be run.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 12, 2004, 12:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 108
RThe key to this situation is "if during the last timed down there is a live ball foul and the penalty is accepted. Deadball fouls are not during the last timed down. Also a USP would not extend the period for an untimed down
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 12, 2004, 01:00am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 108
JR did you reread your thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 12, 2004, 01:06am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Unhappy Yup!!

Quote:
Originally posted by SJoldguy
JR did you reread your thoughts?
I did not see the part "dead ball." I just read double personal foul.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 12, 2004, 01:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 108
JR, I always like reading your comments. They are very accurate. I tried to e-mail you about it but you are blocked.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 12, 2004, 01:20am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Email me at [email protected]

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 13, 2004, 07:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 1,319
Quote:
Originally posted by Ed Maeder
Have a question on a situation we had tonight. After a play we had a double personal foul dead ball. There was 24 seconds left in the game both players were ejected. The clock was started on the ready for play and it ran out without a play being run. In the NFHS book in Rule 3-3 Art3 it states that a period must be extended with an untimed down if during the last timed down of the period a penalty is accepted. Are these penalties considered to be during a timed down and did we need to run a play or not?
The key to understanding this is the phrase during the last timed down.

A down begins when the ball is legally snapped or free-kicked and ends when the ball next becomes dead. So in order to have a down in progress, the ball must be snapped. In other words, to have a foul DURING a down, the ball is live by definition.
__________________
Mike Sears
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 13, 2004, 02:00pm
Never Stop Learning
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 518
We let the clock run out and one of the crew insisted we had to run an untimed down. We didn't and I read him that it had to be during a timed down and accepted, but he still insisted that the foul is considered during the down for some reason. Thanks for all the replies.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 14, 2004, 05:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 842
Send a message via AIM to cowbyfan1 Send a message via Yahoo to cowbyfan1
He probably consideered it part of the down once the ready was blown.
__________________
Jim

Need an out, get an out. Need a run, balk it in.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1