NFL Replay Review
 

I thought the point of replay review was to right a wrong, not to create something that isn't there.

Eric Weddle intercepts bobbled ball pass intended for Antonio Brown - NFL Videos

Additionally,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1F3N...ature=youtu.be

And,

https://twitter.com/YotesHereToStay/...94665273237504

NFL uses centralized review similar to MLB, correct? Seems like some pretty major errors to make.

I can understand where they're coming from in the Ravens-Steelers play, but I disagree with it.

I do not understand the question. It looks like there was an issue of a catch-no catch?

It appears that this could have been a legitimate review as it appears there catch-no catch issue? What was the actual ruling on the play?

Peace

They originally called it a catch and tackle. Review changed it to an interception at the spot.

Well, replay can make that an interception if you believe there was one. The originally did not allow multiple things to be reviewed, but that changed after some high-profile situations.

Peace

I understand that. The problem is that there was nothing there to justify an overturn, in my opinion. That could stem from the rule being logic-defying.

I realize I didn't go about introducing this the best way, but I did want to spur discussion.

The whole issue really stems from what is "completing the catch".