JRutledge wroteWell, replay can make that an interception if you believe there was one. The originally did not allow multiple things to be reviewed, but that changed after some high-profile situations.
Peace
I understand that. The problem is that there was nothing there to justify an overturn, in my opinion. That could stem from the rule being logic-defying.
I realize I didn't go about introducing this the best way, but I did want to spur discussion.