The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Football (https://forum.officiating.com/football/)
-   -   Spike the ball to stop the clock (https://forum.officiating.com/football/101728-spike-ball-stop-clock.html)

voiceoflg Sun Oct 16, 2016 08:16am

Spike the ball to stop the clock
 
I saw something Friday night (FED) I have never seen before, so I am coming to you all to help educate me.

Clock is winding down so the offense looks to spike the ball to stop the clock. I know the QB has to be under center. Here, the QB is in the shotgun, takes the snap, turns around so his back is to the LOS and spikes the ball. Officials blow the whistle, signal incomplete pass and stop the clock.

Is this the correct ruling? I have no idea, just never saw that before.

Rich Sun Oct 16, 2016 08:17am

No. Backward pass. Play it.

HLin NC Sun Oct 16, 2016 09:17am

Wrong in so many ways.:(

bwburke94 Sun Oct 16, 2016 09:49am

Assuming that the spike was a forward pass (which it may not have been given the description), this seems like intentional grounding.

If the spike was not a forward pass, it is treated the same as any other backward pass and is a live ball. Not a foul because IG requires a forward pass.

Texas Aggie Sun Oct 16, 2016 02:21pm

Same in NCAA except [Fed guys ignore the rest...]








passer doesn't have to be under center.

Robert Goodman Sun Oct 16, 2016 02:27pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by voiceoflg (Post 991878)
I saw something Friday night (FED) I have never seen before, so I am coming to you all to help educate me.

Clock is winding down so the offense looks to spike the ball to stop the clock. I know the QB has to be under center. Here, the QB is in the shotgun, takes the snap, turns around so his back is to the LOS and spikes the ball. Officials blow the whistle, signal incomplete pass and stop the clock.

Is this the correct ruling? I have no idea, just never saw that before.

Assuming the ball went backward relative to the field, the correct ruling is for the inadvertent whistle.

OKREF Sun Oct 16, 2016 06:15pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert Goodman (Post 991900)
Assuming the ball went backward relative to the field, the correct ruling is for the inadvertent whistle.


Would you actually make that mechanical a ruling?:rolleyes:

Robert Goodman Mon Oct 17, 2016 08:16am

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKREF (Post 991906)
Would you actually make that mechanical a ruling?:rolleyes:

When it's the player, rather than an official, who does something stupid, yes.

MD Longhorn Mon Oct 17, 2016 02:31pm

The confusion between you two, and why it seems like the other is picking nits is this:

The QB was facing AWAY from the LOS. Unless he threw it straight down toward his feet - the pass likely went backward. but if this was the case, wouldn't even the rookiest of rookies realize that the "spike" was a backward pass?

If he threw it nearly straight down and back toward the LOS (or close enough that R is not positive), it's forward. But this pass seems awkward.

I would be asking why the heck the QB turned to face away from the LOS.

HLin NC Mon Oct 17, 2016 03:04pm

Quote:

I would be asking why the heck the QB turned to face away from the LOS.
Purely speculative but my guess is that is what a/the coach told him to do because he figured out if it isn't a forward pass it wouldn't be IG. The kid MIGHT have come up with it on his own though. Then somebody in stripes blows his whistle and cobbles the whole thing up.

R- "Coach, you remember that question I asked you in pre-game about any unusual plays you might run......?"

jblowery Mon Oct 17, 2016 04:44pm

So if the pass was backward and there was an IW because the ref thought the pass was forward the clock would re-start on the ready for play, right?

Rich Mon Oct 17, 2016 05:46pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jblowery (Post 991976)
So if the pass was backward and there was an IW because the ref thought the pass was forward the clock would re-start on the ready for play, right?



The clock always starts on the RFP after an IW.

Robert Goodman Mon Oct 17, 2016 10:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich (Post 991980)
The clock always starts on the RFP after an IW.

Then what's the significance of the qualifying phrase, "if the clock was stopped for any reason other than specified in Rule 3-4-3 or an untimed down"? Doesn't that mean that if the clock is stopped for reasons specified in 3-4-3, that would supersede 3-4-2(c), and the clock would start on the snap?

Rich Mon Oct 17, 2016 10:08pm

Spike the ball to stop the clock
 
An IW is the only reason a clock would stop if there was an IW. It's essentially the definition.

Robert Goodman Mon Oct 17, 2016 10:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich (Post 991991)
An IW is the only reason a clock would stop if there was an IW. It's essentially the definition.

I don't understand that, nor what it's supposed to be the definition of.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1