The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 02, 2016, 08:53am
TODO: creative title here
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,250
Play 1: Roughing the Snapper. Team A gets choice to: a) decline the penalty and take the points, or b) accept the penalty and get an untimed down to end the half. (Full disclosure: I've previously worked with 2 of the officials that worked this game).

Play 2: Incomplete.

Play 3: I could see an argument for not having KCI, but this is definitely targeting.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 02, 2016, 09:08am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by jTheUmp View Post
Play 1: Roughing the Snapper. Team A gets choice to: a) decline the penalty and take the points, or b) accept the penalty and get an untimed down to end the half. (Full disclosure: I've previously worked with 2 of the officials that worked this game).
One of the officials in the game is from one of my associations and was referenced in the conversation about the enforcement.

Also, are your options NCAA or NF or both? Because I believe the NF enforcement is different.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 02, 2016, 09:37am
TODO: creative title here
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,250
I was referring strictly to NCAA enforcement in my original post.

For FED:
Play 1: still RTS. K can enforce from the previous spot and have an untimed down, or keep the points and have the 15 yards enforced on the subsequent kickoff at the start of the second half (which is what they did in this game).

Play 2: incomplete.

Play 3: not KCI, but is still targeting.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 02, 2016, 09:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
From an NFHS perspective; Play # 1: Definitely Roughing the Snapper, FG was good, K has option of replaying the down, 15 yds closer during an untimed down OR accepting the score and having the penalty enforced at the succeeding spot, which would be the 2nd half KO (8-4-3-b)

Play #2: The player appears to gain clear possession in the air and maintain it through touching the ground (with both feet) in the endzone, after which the contact drives him to the ground, and contact with the ground dislodges the ball.

The covering official was in excellent position to see the play unfold, and under NCAA rules correctly ruled the pass incomplete. Under NFHS rules, I'd call a TD.(2-4-1)

Play # 3: Both KCI and PF Targeting is correct, and in an NFHS game, #21 (Tenn) is absolutely done for the day and gone. (2-20-2, 9-4-3-m: Disqualification also if any fouls under this article are judged by the game official to be flagrant)

Last edited by ajmc; Fri Sep 02, 2016 at 09:54am.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Video plays from Gonzaga at AZ overtime (Video) Nevadaref Basketball 21 Wed Dec 10, 2014 12:04am
Video for review. Rita C Football 29 Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:41am
Video review bsaucer Baseball 6 Tue Jun 29, 2010 01:46pm
FSN best football plays PSU213 Football 5 Thu Nov 09, 2006 04:29pm
Video review Back In The Saddle Basketball 2 Tue Jan 03, 2006 09:39am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1