Sat Oct 24, 2015, 02:07pm
|
NFHS Official
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,734
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman
Seems that's what it'd have to be, unless the meaning of "targeting" (which is defined, in a note) be subsumed under that of "roughing" (which is not).
Say...is this a situation in which having an opponent DQd would be a choice? In the course of administering a single penalty, the non-offending captain is never given the choice of disqualif'n, it's automatic if it's there. However, if it's a choice of penalties for a single act that was both roughing & targeting, would that choice mean they were deciding whether a player would be DQd? Or would you say one penalty is being accepted & the other declined, with the declined penalty (if it's that one) still having the automatic DQ'n?
|
NFHS, targeting isn't automatic DQ
|