Another Texas incident... (Video)

[jTheUmp]

I don't think a law, or any proposed change to the law, would've made one bit of difference on the field in either of these games.

The John Jay incident was clearly a premeditated act on the part of the two players involved (and, it sounds like, at least one ass. coach; and yes, I intentionally abbreviated it that way).

This incident seems like more of a 'heat of the moment' type thing.

[MD Longhorn]

I still want to know why he thinks the law needs to be changed... what needs to be changed about it.

[InsideTheStripe]

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn

I still want to know why he thinks the law needs to be changed... what needs to be changed about it.

He probably thinks it should be made a felony, like it is in many other states.

[Cliffdweller]

I believe it is because the "Law" as currently written only addresses assaults on an official by a person not involved in the sport, meaning it does not cover assault by a player/coach on an official.

[Robert Goodman]

Originally Posted by Cliffdweller

I believe it is because the "Law" as currently written only addresses assaults on an official by a person not involved in the sport, meaning it does not cover assault by a player/coach on an official.

Is that an exception to the general law of assault? So it's specifically not an assault if it's by a player or coach on an official at the same event?

[bigjohn]

Lets talk rules, should that crew immediately suspend that came and offending team forfeits?

I would think so!

ART. 6 . . . The referee has authority to rule promptly, and in the spirit of good
sportsmanship, on any situation not specifically covered in the rules. The ref -
eree’s decisions are final in all matters pertaining to the game.



ART. 10 . . . The referee’s decision to forfeit a game is final.


Also NFHS should edit the casebook to include this type of situation and say the officials can declare a forfeit for any physical attack on an official.

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by bigjohn

Lets talk rules, should that crew immediately suspend that came and offending team forfeits?

I would think so!

ART. 6 . . . The referee has authority to rule promptly, and in the spirit of good
sportsmanship, on any situation not specifically covered in the rules. The ref -
eree’s decisions are final in all matters pertaining to the game.



ART. 10 . . . The referee’s decision to forfeit a game is final.


Also NFHS should edit the casebook to include this type of situation and say the officials can declare a forfeit for any physical attack on an official.

What do NFHS rules or the NFHS itself have to do with this?

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by InsideTheStripe

He probably thinks it should be made a felony, like it is in many other states.

Like it is in Texas...

I believe it is because the "Law" as currently written only addresses assaults on an official by a person not involved in the sport, meaning it does not cover assault by a player/coach on an official.

Not true. It covers this situation... and it IS being followed up on as an assault.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn

Like it is in Texas...

Not true. It covers this situation... and it IS being followed up on as an assault.

ajmc has a good point -- when that attack happened at John Jay, they should've stopped the game and led those criminals off the field in cuffs.

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by Rich

ajmc has a good point -- when that attack happened at John Jay, they should've stopped the game and led those criminals off the field in cuffs.

I agree.

The law is fine. And it supports us.

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn

And it supports us.

The UIL and district administrators on the other hand...

[CT1]

Originally Posted by Rich

ajmc has a good point -- when that attack happened at John Jay, they should've stopped the game and led those criminals off the field in cuffs.

Exactly.

We wouldn't have played another snap in my game until those players were led off in front of God and everbody.

[ajmc]

Originally Posted by jTheUmp

I don't think a law, or any proposed change to the law, would've made one bit of difference on the field in either of these games.
This incident seems like more of a 'heat of the moment' type thing.

I don't know if the "Law" itself needs revision, as much as the possible enforcement. Leading these (out of personal control THUGS) off the playing field in handcuffs might lessen the temperature of "moments" they need to learn to handle better.