Matt S. Legal screen...no true displacement. On a more important note, I'm firing the director of the telecast...don't cut from a high-angle shot to that baseline garbage mid-play!!!
Camron Rust At the top of the key...no. It looked entirely legal to me. The one on the low block....doesn't look like it but really don't have enough of the play in the clip from the right angles to tell for sure.
Blindolbat I got nothing at top of key, but would definitely be leaning towards a yes on the low block.
Nevadaref Blindolbat wroteI got nothing at top of key, but would definitely be leaning towards a yes on the low block. Yep.
JugglingReferee No on the high screen, and absolutely a suspicious play on the low screen. I'd like to have seen more of that low action to know for sure, but from what was visible, I can see a call being made and would support it.
ballgame99 The low screen looked suspect. That would be a tough one to see with the swing pass though.
Rob1968 Is the upper screen considered to have met the the requirement in 4-40-5 for screening a moving opponent, that a "normal step or stride" was allowed by the screener's position?
Adam Everyone agrees there's nothing to call up top. Underneath, I'm not sure. The last angle is best, but it doesn't start soon enough.