JRutledge 13:24 or so in the second half. There was a Flagrant 1 called against the UCLA player and then a technical foul. Unfortunately I missed all replays but would like to have this shown. Peace
[deleted] JRutledge wroteThere was a Flagrant 1 called against the UCLA player and then a technical foul. I don't like either one. First foul was simply hard, second looked like incidental contact.
paulsonj72 JRutledge wrote13:24 or so in the second half. There was a Flagrant 1 called against the UCLA player and then a technical foul. Unfortunately I missed all replays but would like to have this shown. Peace Are we talking about what happened with 13:24 left in the game. According to the Play by play Otto Ocheniks of Minnesota was called for a foul and following the dead ball Tony Parker was then called for a dead ball contact T. If this is the situation you are looking at. It all happened after a TV timeout
[deleted] paulsonj72 wroteAre we talking about what happened with 13:24 left in the game. Accordibg to the Play by play Otto Ocheniks of Minnesota was called for a foul and following the dead ball Tony Parker was then called for a dead ball contact T. If this is the situation you are looking at. It all happened after a TV timeout Yes, that situation.
paulsonj72 I watched the play and in the play the MN player made an aggressive play for the ball and was wihistled for the common fould in the act of shooting. Following the whistle for the common foul Parker made contact with Oscheniks which in a live ball situation would have been a flagrant 1. However since the ball was dead the call was a dead ball contact Technical
APG Rich wroteYup, elbow above to the head. Pretty automatic. Did they get this live or need the monitor? Went to the monitor
paulsonj72 Rich wroteYup, elbow above to the head. Pretty automatic. Did they get this live or need the monitor? They also had a TV timeout after the play so there was some extra time to look at it.