26 Year Gap rekent wroteHere is what my thoughts were directed toward. So if you could go back you would have hit him with a flagrant? It would have been an unsporting technical. Not a flagrant foul.
rekent 26 Year Gap wroteIt would have been an unsporting technical. Not a flagrant foul. I was thinking it could fall under 4-18-2. Of course, based on severity, whether the intent was deemed to be malicious, and the player's demeanor.