Aggressively approaching official

Camron Rust

Rich wrote
No, I'm saying that I'd eject a coach who had to be restrained, removed a coat, and threw it after receiving the first technical. And would lose no sleep over it.

SOunds good to me. Seems like we may have been talking past each other. That is not the situation I was necessarily thinking of.

BillyMac

BadNewsRef wrote
Emphatically removing one’s coat in response to a call/no-call or throwing equipment or clothing on to the floor.

rockyroad wrote
By rule the jacket toss is considered a separate act...

BillyMac wrote
... for throwing the clothing on to the floor. In this case the clothing was thrown to an assistant coach. I don't have a horse in this race, just a point of fact.

rockyroad wrote
Leave something out? The operative word in icallfouls post would be the "OR"...

I was specifically referring to the toss, not the removal. According to the rule posted, removal can be charged with a technical, but a toss must be to the floor. Again, just a point of fact, not an opinion on the play.

Raymond

BillyMac wrote
I was specifically referring to the toss, not the removal. According to the rule posted, removal can be charged with a technical, but a toss must be to the floor. Again, just a point of fact, not an opinion on the play.

You left off some important words:

"including, but not limited to"

Rich

Camron Rust wrote
SOunds good to me. Seems like we may have been talking past each other. That is not the situation I was necessarily thinking of.

Isn't that the situation in the WNBA game, though?

JRutledge

BadNewsRef wrote
You left off some important words:

"including, but not limited to"

Rich wrote
Isn't that the situation in the WNBA game, though?

I have seen NBA coaches get tossed for less.

Peace

Camron Rust

Rich wrote
Isn't that the situation in the WNBA game, though?

I guess so. Some of my replies were more generic and not specifically about this specific example. That said, I had also watch the video at work without sound and didn't realize she had been T'd right at the very beginning of the video. I had focused on the middle of the video with the replay of the toss and the foul. I have now rewatched the video and realize when the original T occurred much earlier. Two T's are earned on that one.

MD Longhorn

Camron Rust wrote
SOunds good to me. Seems like we may have been talking past each other. That is not the situation I was necessarily thinking of.

Are you still discussing the actual play? Or are you trying to say that in some hypothetical similar plays you may or may not dodge the ejection by deciding the coach's marionette show was all one show? The OP - the actual play on the actual court - it's clear cut that she should have been T'd up twice, even at the WNBA level, but most definitely so at any other level below that.

Raymond

Camron Rust wrote
I guess so. Some of my replies were more generic and not specifically about this specific example. That said, I had also watch the video at work without sound and didn't realize she had been T'd right at the very beginning of the video. I had focused on the middle of the video with the replay of the toss and the foul. I have now rewatched the video and realize when the original T occurred much earlier. Two T's are earned on that one.

The first T in the video was for the player. Then the coach got T'd for her initial reaction.

Camron Rust

BadNewsRef wrote
The first T in the video was for the player. Then the coach got T'd for her initial reaction.

Yes, but they were both at the start...I didn't realized both were T'd up at the beginning...way before the jacket sequence.

« Previous Page