greatest interference play i ever heard

andyump

Pretty clear cut,except for 0 outs
scored tied,bottom of the 7th runners on 2nd and 3rd high fly ball hit to ss runner from 3rd base raises home, runner on 2nd base grabs ss as she is ready to catch fly ball (remember runner on 3rd touched home when interference accurs) would you let the winning run to score?
Edit/Delete Message

MD Longhorn

andyump wrote
wow did everyone get off on different plays then first described all that is stated do we score the runner from third, 1st criteria ball is not caught, 2nd runner on 3rd touched home before interference , we have 0 outs what is all the confusion do we score runnner and go home or not?

I don't. I have intentional interference to prevent a double play. Runner on 3rd out, runner on 2nd out, batter to first.

rwest

mbcrowder wrote
I don't. I have intentional interference to prevent a double play. Runner on 3rd out, runner on 2nd out, batter to first.

The rule says you get the trailing runner out. Not the lead runner.

andyump

tell them RW YOU CAN GET A DP but runner still scores

rwest

andyump wrote
tell them RW YOU CAN GET A DP but runner still scores

I think that's what I said. 🙂

Dakota

andyump wrote
Pretty clear cut,except for 0 outs ...

Which was, of course, critical to giving an answer, which led to all of the alternate scenarios. 🙄

But, even though the way the situation was stated in the OP was an invitation to elaboration and alternate scenarios, we've never really needed a reason to go OT around here. 🙂

JefferMC

Dakota wrote
... we've never really needed a reason to go OT around here. 🙂

Did someone say beer?

Tru_in_Blu

Deja vu.

All over again.

IRISHMAFIA

Dakota wrote
Which was, of course, critical to giving an answer, which led to all of the alternate scenarios. 🙄

But, even though the way the situation was stated in the OP was an invitation to elaboration and alternate scenarios, we've never really needed a reason to go OT around here. 🙂

It was the responders which ASSUMED and try to apply different scenarios involving outs that were not offered. If you don't tell me there are outs, I addressing the scenario as if there were no outs.

And yes, I would allow the run to score.

HugoTafurst

IRISHMAFIA wrote
And yes, I would allow the run to score.

Gee, that kind of sucks, doesn't it?
😕

IRISHMAFIA

HugoTafurst wrote
Gee, that kind of sucks, doesn't it?
:confused:

Andy is right. According to the rules, the run scores. Doesn't say I have to like it.

HugoTafurst

IRISHMAFIA wrote
Andy is right. According to the rules, the run scores. Doesn't say I have to like it.

I know - sometimes I wish I was one of those guys who could just make up rulings as I feel.

andyump

Irish Mafia I respect your opionion so if you say run scores Now i know the run scores, Kenny keep on thinking of these scenarios

« Previous Page