possesion

furlu55

a1 attempts a shot and makes the basket....b2 fouls a2 after the shot has been released....does team A get 2 pts plus possesion again?

tjones1

furlu55 wrote
a1 attempts a shot and makes the basket....b2 fouls a2 after the shot has been released....does team A get 2 pts plus possesion again?

Yup.

BktBallRef

furlu55 wrote
a1 attempts a shot and makes the basket....b2 fouls a2 after the shot has been released....does team A get 2 pts plus possesion again?

Count the basket. A gets the ball or FTs if in the bonus.

Rich

We had such a situation tonight. Partner (T) had a 3 point shot by A, I had a player from B grab an A player and throw her aside in order to clear space for the rebound. Ended up being a six point play.

Cobra

furlu55 wrote
a1 attempts a shot and makes the basket....b2 fouls a2 after the shot has been released....does team A get 2 pts plus possesion again?

It depends on if the shooter has returned to the floor yet. If he is still in the air then it would be a shooting foul. If he has already returned to the floor then it is a common foul and A would get a throw in.

just another ref

Cobra wrote
It depends on if the shooter has returned to the floor yet. If he is still in the air then it would be a shooting foul. If he has already returned to the floor then it is a common foul and A would get a throw in.

Read it again. A1 was the shooter. A2 was the player who was fouled.

Cobra

just another ref wrote
Read it again. A1 was the shooter. A2 was the player who was fouled.

Ok, well still when the ball is released doesn't really matter. You should remember that you need to rule if the foul was before or after the motion which habitually precedes the try had begun.

Loudwhistle

Cobra wrote
It depends on if the shooter has returned to the floor yet. If he is still in the air then it would be a shooting foul. If he has already returned to the floor then it is a common foul and A would get a throw in.

totally lost me

Freddy

furlu55 wrote
a1 attempts a shot and makes the basket....b2 fouls a2 after the shot has been released....does team A get 2 pts plus possesion again?

Yep. Had it just last night. Quite common, actually.
One reason it's not called the times it occurs is because there are either four (in two-man) or six (in three-man) eyes on the ball.

TimTaylor

Cobra wrote
Ok, well still when the ball is released doesn't really matter. You should remember that you need to rule if the foul was before or after the motion which habitually precedes the try had begun.

Not at all relevant to the OP - foul was after release.

Cobra

TimTaylor wrote
Not at all relevant to the OP - foul was after release.

Well we don't want people thinking the ball has to be released or it becomes dead on the foul.

Adam

Freddy wrote
Yep. Had it just last night. Quite common, actually.
One reason it's not called the times it occurs is because there are either four (in two-man) or six (in three-man) eyes on the ball.

Disagree, one of the main reasons it's not called often is there's no real advantage if the shot is made. Typically, when it's called, it's called because the fouled player was displaced by a lot or the game is getting chippy and a call needs to be made to clean things up.

Judtech

Freddy wrote
Yep. Had it just last night. Quite common, actually.
One reason it's not called the times it occurs is because there are either four (in two-man) or six (in three-man) eyes on the ball.

I didn't have a partner named FREDDY last nite:confused: Although mine was on a 3 pt shot and a push through a screen!

Raymond

Cobra wrote
It depends on if the shooter has returned to the floor yet. If he is still in the air then it would be a shooting foul. If he has already returned to the floor then it is a common foul and A would get a throw in.

🙄

Cobra wrote
Well we don't want people thinking the ball has to be released or it becomes dead on the foul.

How about this instead? You were wrong.

TimTaylor

badnewsref wrote
:rolleyes:

How about this instead? You were wrong.

Adam

badnewsref wrote
:rolleyes:

How about this instead? You were wrong.

Cobra

BadNewsRef wrote
:rolleyes:

How about this instead? You were wrong.

What is the big deal? I thought the guy who was shooting got fouled. Of course the ruling is going to be wrong if the situation is not understood.

Snaqwells wrote
+2

You seem to get little rules wrong somewhat often when you understand the situation....saying personal foul when the term would be common foul....thinking after a flagrant foul a player becomes bench personnel after the player, not coach, is notified. It's not a big deal but you don't need to be getting on me because I misread a situation.

Adam

The difference is, I'll say I was wrong if I was rather than dance around it.

Raymond

cobra wrote
what is the big deal? I thought the guy who was shooting got fouled. Of course the ruling is going to be wrong if the situation is not understood.

....

r.i.f.

Cobra

Snaqwells wrote
The difference is, I'll say I was wrong if I was rather than dance around it.

I don't believe you said you were wrong either one of those times. And I'm not dancing around it. The person asking the question seemed to think that when the shot was released mattered in some way. I was just making sure it was clear that it does not. Getting something right, but for the wrong reason, is still a missed call.