pizanno Snaqwells wroteCase play: 2.10.1D similar to the POI rule: 4-36-2b Thanks, Snaq. I think I read too much into the 'possession' phrasing. Certainly wouldn't want to line them up and have A score again off a missed FT.
Nevadaref pizanno wroteThanks, Snaq. I think I read too much into the 'possession' phrasing. Certainly wouldn't want to line them up and have A score again off a missed FT. You've got it right now. 🙂
Jurassic Referee Back In The Saddle wroteThe possession question is entirely separate from the at the disposal question. Whether the ball is at the thrower's disposal is key to determining if we're still within the time frame to correct the error. Whether there has been a change of possession is key to determining how to resume play after correcting the error.Agree. I was commenting only on the error correction time frame, not the actual correction. At least I thought I was. 🙂
ref2coach A question regarding "change of possession". (c.o.p.) A1 is shooting an un-merited FT. (a)B1 or (b)A2 secures the rebound. In (a) this would a c.o.p. in (b) it would not be c.o.p.? Do I have that right?
bob jenkins ref2coach wroteA question regarding "change of possession". (c.o.p.) A1 is shooting an un-merited FT. (a)B1 or (b)A2 secures the rebound. In (a) this would a c.o.p. in (b) it would not be c.o.p.? Do I have that right? I think there's some case (but it might be only NCAA, I forget) where (a) is NOT COP
Back In The Saddle Jurassic Referee wroteAgree. I was commenting only on the error correction time frame, not the actual correction. At least I thought I was. 🙂 I'm with ya now 🙂