Game venting.

OHBBREF

Scratch85 wrote
IMO, it doesn't matter if the remaining coach is deemed the HC or an AC, the first technincal charged directly or indirectly to the HC results in THE "LOSS OF COACHING BOX PRIVELEGES"

It is the "coaching box privelege" that is gone. Nothing more, nothing less.

But it does mater about the HC or AC because of what happens with direct and indirect technical fouls.
there are scenarios where this could be an issue, (while I do not want to be the official involved), there could be a scenario where the coach now in charge could be ejected also for the accumulation of direct and indirect technicals also. So if the replacement remains the assisitant coach what happens to bench technicals who are they charged to?

Raymond

OHBBREF wrote
But it does mater about the HC or AC because of what happens with direct and indirect technical fouls.
there are scenarios where this could be an issue, (while I do not want to be the official involved), there could be a scenario where the coach now in charge could be ejected also for the accumulation of direct and indirect technicals also. So if the replacement remains the assisitant coach what happens to bench technicals who are they charged to?

Good question, but that does change the fact that the coaches box privileges are gone once the head coach receives his first T. Whoever replaces the HC does not get the privilege of the coaches box.

Scratch85

FWIW, If I am calling a HS game and the HC gets tossed, The adult that replaces him/her will be deemed the HC. Directs and Indirects will now go to that person as required by rule. Other HC priveleges that were available (calling TO's, standing to applaude, etc.) at the time of the ejection are also available for the new HC.

jearef

BadNewsRef wrote
Good question, but that does change the fact that the coaches box privileges are gone once the head coach receives his first T. Whoever replaces the HC does not get the privilege of the coaches box.

I have always thought that once the box is lost, it is lost for everyone. That being said, OHBBREF raises a valid point. I think this one is worthy of its own thread.

Adam

jearef wrote
I have always thought that once the box is lost, it is lost for everyone. That being said, OHBBREF raises a valid point. I think this one is worthy of its own thread.

Let me just pose this question.

Do you really think the rules committee wants the team to gain an advantage (renewed use of the coaching box) from their coach earning a 2nd direct T?

deecee

Another scenario thats an eyebrow raiser. The assistant coach is still just that. The head coach has been tossed. The assistant is granted privledges that the HC had and didnt have prior to the tossing. One of those lost privledges the right to the box. He doesn't have that.

Adam

deecee wrote
Another scenario thats an eyebrow raiser. The assistant coach is still just that. The head coach has been tossed. The assistant is granted privledges that the HC had and didnt have prior to the tossing. One of those lost privledges the right to the box. He doesn't have that.

The way I look at it, he's filling in. He gets the same abilities the HC had when he left. He can do what the HC was able to do (request TO, stand to cheer a play, etc.), and cannot do what the HC had lost the ability to do (stand in the box).

deecee

Snaqwells wrote
The way I look at it, he's filling in. He gets the same abilities the HC had when he left. He can do what the HC was able to do (request TO, stand to cheer a play, etc.), and cannot do what the HC had lost the ability to do (stand in the box).

I am in agreeance with you. I just re-read what I typed and I think I confused myself...

Adam

deecee wrote
I am in agreeance with you. I just re-read what I typed and I think I confused myself...

I knew you agreed with me on this one, I was just elaborating further.

Scratch85

Snaqwells wrote
The way I look at it, he's filling in. He gets the same abilities the HC had when he left. He can do what the HC was able to do (request TO, stand to cheer a play, etc.), and cannot do what the HC had lost the ability to do (stand in the box).

That looks like my post. At least give me a footnote or something. 😀

Adam

Scratch85 wrote
That looks like my post. At least give me a footnote or something. 😃

I don't know how.

M&M Guy

Snaqwells wrote
I don't know how.

I agree with Scratch85. 😀

Adam

M&M Guy wrote
I agree with Scratch85. 😃

"Shut up." Jurassic Referee, 2007

« Previous Page