Dan_ref Originally posted by Bart Tyson OK, BktBallRef changes the play, now Dan_Ref changes BktBallRef's change by saying team B not in the blocks. Lets change it again and say Team B had six players on the court. Nope, not what happened at all. Reread my last 2 posts, they are completely separate, the first is my response to bktballref's change, the second is a followup to slider. We got a lot of threads going on here!
Slider Originally posted by Dan_ref Does the L's screw-up invalidate the rules governing FT's? [/B]Yes.
Dan_ref Originally posted by Slider Originally posted by Dan_ref Does the L's screw-up invalidate the rules governing FT's? Yes. [/B] Although I find your style entertaining you would be wrong. But I like that, it's your story and you're sticking to it.
rainmaker Wow, cool! Do you realize that we've gone three pages without ever calling anyone names, or taking anything personally; Also we've stayed on topic. Do you think we might all be growing up a little?
ChuckElias Originally posted by rainmaker Do you think we might all be growing up a little? Jeez, I hope not! That would suck all the fun right out of the board. 😉 Party-pooper!! Does that count as name-calling? 😛 Chuck
Mark T.​ DeNucci, Sr.​ I am still confused. How does the Lead's screw-up invalidate the free throws that were shot? I have yet to see any rules reference that would allow us to invoke the correctable error rule. A1 and Team A got to shoot free throws that they were entitled.
Brad I agree Mark -- this is NOT a correctable error. It is what we call, in technical terms, an official screw-up. And it is not correctable.
Mark Dexter Originally posted by rainmaker Wow, cool! Do you realize that we've gone three pages without ever calling anyone names, or taking anything personally; Also we've stayed on topic. Do you think we might all be growing up a little? Maybe a little. Of course, the "force-out" topic erased any of that . . .