Calling on Jurassic (and other wise officials)

BktBallRef

IREFU2 wrote
Wow, just taking the test, when does your season start?

The NFHS test date was Monday of this week. If you're taking the online test, you have all week long. So there's nothing late about taking the test at this time.

IREFU2 wrote
Interesting, I was told that VA was going to on line testing next year. How was the experience?

It's been a major headache all week long.

BktBallRef

fullor30 wrote
JR..............you always have the right rule # or casebook reference at your fingertips. Is the the product of looking it up or do you have a system for researching these questions. I suspect you do it the old fashioned way and dive into the manuals. The old saying 'he who chops wood stays warm twice', meaning by you looking these cases up, it keeps you spot on regarding rulings.

Not only do you know the letter of the law, but apply common sense to your game philosophy.

Damn, it's getting deep in here!!!!!

Jurassic Referee

Dan_ref wrote
btw JR, sorry to hear about your cousin.

I'm know I'm gonna regret this, but......

What cousin, Slappy?

Dan_ref

Enjoy

http://forum.officiating.com/showthread.php?t=5559

bob jenkins

jdw3018 wrote
I have a question about this one - 8-1-2 reads that following a violation by one or both teams, if the offending team(s) continues to delay, a technical foul shall be called.

Does this mean that because the throw was successful, no violation was called, and therefore no technical for the second delay? If the throw was unsuccessful, would the technical then be called?

I think that's what I'm reading, but not sure if a delayed lane violation is considered a violation for purposes of this rule even if not called?

If the FT was good, then we just move on to the next FT. SO, there's not really a "delay". No dealy; no T for "further delay".

Jurassic Referee

Dan_ref wrote
Enjoy

Don't be sardonic.

rockyroad

Jurassic Referee wrote
Don't be sardonic.

Is that anything like being a pusillanimous??

rainmaker

rockyroad wrote
Is that anything like being a pusillanimous??

Oh, no. Sardonic is much better. More strength. More aggression. Better nicknames!

Jurassic Referee

rainmaker wrote
Oh, no. Sardonic is much better. More strength. More aggression. Better nicknames!

That's right out of the best-selling book--"Males Are From Sardonic; Wimmen Are From Pusillanimous".

It's true, it's true......

rainmaker

Jurassic Referee wrote
That's right out of the best-selling book--"Males Are From Sardonic; Wimmen Are From Pusillanimous".

It's true, it's true......

What a sardo... ??? or is that too edgy?

« Previous Page