warning or T?

Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

Originally posted by JohnBark
is it a T and a team delay warning if B1 touches the ball while A1 is holding the ball OB for a throw in? or is it just a T and no warning?

NFHS Rules Only: The touching for the ball by B1 is this situation is a technical foul charged against B1 for delay of game. If Team B has not yet been issued a warning for a breaking the throw-in plane violation, the Team B is also issued an official team warning. If Team B has already been issued an official team warning for a breaking the throw-in violation, B1 is stilled charged with a technical foul for delay of game but Team B is not charged with a technical foul for delay because B1's infraction of the rules trumps the infraction of delay by Team B.
Making up your own interpretations again, Mark?

Do you have a rules citation or casebook play play that will TRUMP Rule 9-2Penalty3 AND Rule 10-3-11 plus Penalty? Neither of those rules mentions a double penalty being involved. They both say that it's a plain ol', simple T- with no team warning entered- just like Rut said.

Btw, isn't this the exact same play that you tried to argue a coupla year's ago that it WAS 2 T's if a team had already been warned for breaking the plane?

Gotta apologize after thinking about this, and going and getting the rule books out. Mark was right. It is a T AND a warning. Casebook play 9.2.11 states that.

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

Originally posted by JohnBark
is it a T and a team delay warning if B1 touches the ball while A1 is holding the ball OB for a throw in? or is it just a T and no warning?

NFHS Rules Only: The touching for the ball by B1 is this situation is a technical foul charged against B1 for delay of game. If Team B has not yet been issued a warning for a breaking the throw-in plane violation, the Team B is also issued an official team warning. If Team B has already been issued an official team warning for a breaking the throw-in violation, B1 is stilled charged with a technical foul for delay of game but Team B is not charged with a technical foul for delay because B1's infraction of the rules trumps the infraction of delay by Team B.
Making up your own interpretations again, Mark?

Do you have a rules citation or casebook play play that will TRUMP Rule 9-2Penalty3 AND Rule 10-3-11 plus Penalty? Neither of those rules mentions a double penalty being involved. They both say that it's a plain ol', simple T- with no team warning entered- just like Rut said.

Btw, isn't this the exact same play that you tried to argue a coupla year's ago that it WAS 2 T's if a team had already been warned for breaking the plane?

Gotta apologize after thinking about this, and going and getting the rule books out. Mark was right. It is a T AND a warning. Casebook play 9.2.11 states that.

Oh, oh, it looks like Frances is going to by-pass my mother and sister in Orlando and head straight for Canada.

Dan_ref

Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

Originally posted by JohnBark
is it a T and a team delay warning if B1 touches the ball while A1 is holding the ball OB for a throw in? or is it just a T and no warning?

NFHS Rules Only: The touching for the ball by B1 is this situation is a technical foul charged against B1 for delay of game. If Team B has not yet been issued a warning for a breaking the throw-in plane violation, the Team B is also issued an official team warning. If Team B has already been issued an official team warning for a breaking the throw-in violation, B1 is stilled charged with a technical foul for delay of game but Team B is not charged with a technical foul for delay because B1's infraction of the rules trumps the infraction of delay by Team B.
Making up your own interpretations again, Mark?

Do you have a rules citation or casebook play play that will TRUMP Rule 9-2Penalty3 AND Rule 10-3-11 plus Penalty? Neither of those rules mentions a double penalty being involved. They both say that it's a plain ol', simple T- with no team warning entered- just like Rut said.

Btw, isn't this the exact same play that you tried to argue a coupla year's ago that it WAS 2 T's if a team had already been warned for breaking the plane?

Gotta apologize after thinking about this, and going and getting the rule books out. Mark was right. It is a T AND a warning. Casebook play 9.2.11 states that.

Oh, oh, it looks like Frances is going to by-pass my mother and sister in Orlando and head straight for Canada.

😀

Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by Dan_ref

Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

Originally posted by JohnBark
is it a T and a team delay warning if B1 touches the ball while A1 is holding the ball OB for a throw in? or is it just a T and no warning?

NFHS Rules Only: The touching for the ball by B1 is this situation is a technical foul charged against B1 for delay of game. If Team B has not yet been issued a warning for a breaking the throw-in plane violation, the Team B is also issued an official team warning. If Team B has already been issued an official team warning for a breaking the throw-in violation, B1 is stilled charged with a technical foul for delay of game but Team B is not charged with a technical foul for delay because B1's infraction of the rules trumps the infraction of delay by Team B.
Making up your own interpretations again, Mark?

Do you have a rules citation or casebook play play that will TRUMP Rule 9-2Penalty3 AND Rule 10-3-11 plus Penalty? Neither of those rules mentions a double penalty being involved. They both say that it's a plain ol', simple T- with no team warning entered- just like Rut said.

Btw, isn't this the exact same play that you tried to argue a coupla year's ago that it WAS 2 T's if a team had already been warned for breaking the plane?

Gotta apologize after thinking about this, and going and getting the rule books out. Mark was right. It is a T AND a warning. Casebook play 9.2.11 states that.

Oh, oh, it looks like Frances is going to by-pass my mother and sister in Orlando and head straight for Canada.

😀

WHAAAAAAT???

Sureashell can't argue when it's black-and-white in the rulebook that I was wrong, can I? Anything else that you want me to do? Some kind of penance? Issue a Writ of Atonement?

Dan_ref

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by Dan_ref

Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

Originally posted by JohnBark
is it a T and a team delay warning if B1 touches the ball while A1 is holding the ball OB for a throw in? or is it just a T and no warning?

NFHS Rules Only: The touching for the ball by B1 is this situation is a technical foul charged against B1 for delay of game. If Team B has not yet been issued a warning for a breaking the throw-in plane violation, the Team B is also issued an official team warning. If Team B has already been issued an official team warning for a breaking the throw-in violation, B1 is stilled charged with a technical foul for delay of game but Team B is not charged with a technical foul for delay because B1's infraction of the rules trumps the infraction of delay by Team B.
Making up your own interpretations again, Mark?

Do you have a rules citation or casebook play play that will TRUMP Rule 9-2Penalty3 AND Rule 10-3-11 plus Penalty? Neither of those rules mentions a double penalty being involved. They both say that it's a plain ol', simple T- with no team warning entered- just like Rut said.

Btw, isn't this the exact same play that you tried to argue a coupla year's ago that it WAS 2 T's if a team had already been warned for breaking the plane?

Gotta apologize after thinking about this, and going and getting the rule books out. Mark was right. It is a T AND a warning. Casebook play 9.2.11 states that.

Oh, oh, it looks like Frances is going to by-pass my mother and sister in Orlando and head straight for Canada.

😀

WHAAAAAAT???

Sureashell can't argue when it's black-and-white in the rulebook that I was wrong, can I? Anything else that you want me to do? Some kind of penance? Issue a Writ of Atonement?

First offense, relatively minor, we'll start with this:

Just watch yourself next time, OK?

Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by Dan_ref

[/B]

WHAAAAAAT???

Anything else that you want me to do? Some kind of penance?
[/B][/QUOTE]

First offense, relatively minor, we'll start with this:

Just watch yourself next time, OK? [/B][/QUOTE]Not bad. Guess I can't kick.

Dan_ref

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by Dan_ref

WHAAAAAAT???

Anything else that you want me to do? Some kind of penance?
[/B]

First offense, relatively minor, we'll start with this:

Just watch yourself next time, OK? [/B][/QUOTE]Not bad. Guess I can't kick. [/B][/QUOTE]

Eesh. I warned you, time for the rack...

OOOOOOPS! Sorry! wrong rack.

Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by Dan_ref
[/B]

[/B][/QUOTE]Hmmmmmm! Think that might work on Chuck too? Maybe we can send him one for Christmas. Fix him right up.

If we put Woody in that for a while, we'd have to sing "Get a loooong little doggie" to him.

Dan_ref

BTW, Chuck was caught on camera protesting at the republican convention:

rainmaker

Wow, Chuck your hair grows fast! The pic we saw in the spring you had a nice army cut!