Camron Rust Adam wroteMy understanding is that if we grant a request at a time it shouldn't be granted it is to be treated as an IW: grant the TO and the play would resume based on who had TC when the whistle blew not when the coach spouted off. Agree....I read what you wrote as the pass was in the air when it was granted.
Adam Camron Rust wroteAgree....I read what you wrote as the pass was in the air when it was granted. I wasn't as clear as I could have been, but I was responding to the OP. Pass was in the air when the request was made, but had been intercepted by B by the time it was granted.
bob jenkins Adam wroteI wasn't as clear as I could have been, but I was responding to the OP. Pass was in the air when the request was made, but had been intercepted by B by the time it was granted. In that case I agree.
Raymond If I'm tableside and the coach requests a time-out, it doesn't take much effort to see if his player has the ball in his hand, especially if he has jumped in the air. I don't care what corner he is in.