agr8zebra I do have a DVR of the play, someone want it posted. The ball as we know must pass through the net or become logged in the net.
HokiePaul agr8zebra wroteI do have a DVR of the play, someone want it posted. The ball as we know must pass through the net or become logged in the net. That's what I thought. It didn't make sense to me that the officials went to the monitor though. What were they looking for? And as I said, I only caught a glimpse of the play. i found the whole game here... http://espn.go.com/watchespn/player/_/id/2712665/size/condensed/. Play starts at 1:56:00 into the video, about the 1:40 second mark.
JetMetFan Regarding the monitor review, my guess is they were determining whether the goal was correctly/incorrectly counted under NCAA 11-2.1.b.3.
DrPete I think the Pepperdine player was smart to grab the rebound and head the other way on offense. Others may have taken the ball out thinking the dunk counted.
Camron Rust No PC at all. That player got his feet tangled up with the dribbler and just fell. The T was in perfect position to cover this. No shot, clearly, as it didn't go in and stay in.
BigCat just another ref wroteHis left foot wasn't the pivot? It was a travel. The "ha ha" may have been because they don't call that play travel at that level.
just another ref BigCat wroteIt was a travel. The "ha ha" may have been because they don't call that play travel at that level. So I've been told. I fail to see the humor.
BigCat just another ref wroteSo I've been told. I fail to see the humor. It's one thing to pass when the player has the wide open dunk. It's another when there is a defender near...as in this case.
just another ref BigCat wroteIt's one thing to pass when the player has the wide open dunk. It's another when there is a defender near...as in this case. I have no idea what this means.
BigCat just another ref wroteI have no idea what this means. It means if there is no defender near and the player has a wide open dunk I can see passing on it. (Not calling). In this case the player got to the rim sooner by not putting it on floor. There was a defender who may have been able to make a play if the offense puts it on floor.
Nevadaref just another ref wroteSo I've been told. I fail to see the humor. Anything like refusing to apply the double foul rule when a blarge occurs?
just another ref Nevadaref wroteAnything like refusing to apply the double foul rule when a blarge occurs? We might need a new thread for this.
Camron Rust Nevadaref wroteAnything like refusing to apply the double foul rule when a blarge occurs? I think that might be an unsportsmanlike foul. 😉
BDevil15 It would be interesting to see a super slow motion HD capture of this. This was the best I could manage pausing it but there was a moment just a split second before this where the ball looked like it was clear of the net but had upward momentum.
