OKREF |
Fri Jun 05, 2015 02:16pm |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam
(Post 963392)
By rule, not a violation.
By old interp that most people aren't aware of, it's a violation. The ruling in that interp was flawed, in that they said it was a violation because A "caused the ball to have BC status." Causing the ball to have BC status is never a violation.
|
Ok, that's what I thought. Thanks
|