Wisconsin vs Kentucky (Video 6/6)

[abcdefg]

Originally Posted by AremRed

I think they've been pretty consistent, especially trip-to-trip. I assume from your post about the possible F1 that you think the reffing has been biased against Wisconsin? Did you notice when you wrote your post that Kentucky had more team fouls?

I'd say it was pretty consistent for the bulk of the game, but it wasn't working out that way later in the second half.

[abcdefg]

https://vine.co/v/OlIrbewjA62

The flagrant review.

[bballref3966]

Originally Posted by abcdefg

Kentucky didn't get called for a slap to the face and Twitter freaked out about it - SBNation.com

This is an officiating forum. We discuss officiating, not fanboy tweets about officiating.

[abcdefg]

Originally Posted by bballref3966

This is an officiating forum. We discuss officiating, not fanboy tweets about officiating.

I posted it because it has a couple angles of video...

[mutantducky]

it won't work for all the games but I think for the sweet 16 on I'd like to see an a different replay system. Take it away from the refs on the floor. They take too long but mainly I think there is something where they can't see it from an outside perspective. Those refs who did the game if they had been watching on tv I can assure you they would have called that a flagrant. But if you are reffing perhaps you just don't notice it, some kind of mental block. Nothing against the refs. They did fine in my opinion but that call was a complete miss and I think that is a failure with the current replay system.

[Multiple Sports]

Originally Posted by abcdefg

Kentucky didn't get called for a slap to the face and Twitter freaked out about it - SBNation.com

Look if you want to ask why that wasn't called a F1, that is great, but to post an article of a bunch of tweets from drunken fans is absurd. Join us in a healthy intelligent debate.....

[abcdefg]

Originally Posted by Multiple Sports

Look if you want to ask why that wasn't called a F1, that is great, but to post an article of a bunch of tweets from drunken fans is absurd. Join us in a healthy intelligent debate.....

Edited so nobody else misses the point.

And yes, I'm curious to know what their thought process was that allowed them to miss this clear call.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by abcdefg

Edited so nobody else misses the point.

And yes, I'm curious to know what their thought process was that allowed them to miss this clear call.

You will have to ask them. None of us were the officials on the game.

Peace

[APG]

Guys, I cleaned up the thread...mostly for the post claiming bias (one poster) and subsequent replies that quoted said post.

Keep the discussion on actual officiating (which most of y'all actually have done) and not on questioning the integrity of the officials.

[Multiple Sports]

Originally Posted by APG

Guys, I cleaned up the thread...mostly for the post claiming bias (one poster) and subsequent replies that quoted said post.

Keep the discussion on actual officiating (which most of y'all actually have done) and not on questioning the integrity of the officials.

Thanks Dad !!!!! 😉😉😉😉😉

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by abcdefg

Edited so nobody else misses the point.

And yes, I'm curious to know what their thought process was that allowed them to miss this clear call.

Because it wasn't flagrant. It wasn't an elbow to the face and it wasn't excessive contact. It was a basic swim move that is a common foul all game. It probably should have been a common foul but would have been wrong to go with a flagrant.

[Matt]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Because it wasn't flagrant. It wasn't an elbow to the face and it wasn't excessive contact. It was a basic swim move that is a common foul all game.

He swung. That wasn't a swim move.

[Multiple Sports]

I have no problem with what Cam just posted, if not mistaken, the try was released with about 1 sec left on shot clock.....MAYBE they took their focus off everything else and got caught up with whether the try was a shot clock violation or not....

[derwil]

UK graduate here, should have been a F1. Also should have been OOB and a shot clock violation. Some very good calls, some basically crappy ones.

[rbruno]

The announcers danced around the non call and how it can't be reviewed.
No real replay, but did the first shot with about 3 sec left on shot clock hit the rim? Maybe the officials thought it did and ignored the horn for the shot clock expiring. Or or or they had a blatant easy call shot clock violation that was missed. What do you guys think?