Duke/Notre Dame (Video)
Don't know how accepted this is, but when I watch games I keep a mental log of interesting/teachable plays.
Travel/Held ball at 1:50ish of the 1st half. Double Whistle on a PC/Block call about a minute later. Possible Travel/Contact foul on Okafor at around 16:45 in the 2nd half. |
Another Okafor possible travel, possible PC at 5:30 in 2nd Half
|
Illegal screen 4:21 second half, and embellishment by Duke player?
|
Offensive foul, off ball, on Grant at about 2:35 in 2nd half
|
Poor APG. But God bless him, he's gonna find the videos and post them all. :D
Thanks for what you do, APG. Helps us all get better. |
Quote:
Sheesh. |
GREAT GAME!!
And may I add, 27 sec to go in game. Carolina on the line, shooter crosses free throw line before ball hits the rim. Not called. There was a scramble for the miss shot. They had to go to monitor to award ball the VA. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Wow - where do I start?
1. Looks like a travel to me. 2. Charge - seems like the lead would've had best angle but appears he calls a block. Good job on both to hold the signal though. 3. I don't know what I'm looking at, but that's not Okafor 4. Sure looks like a PC to me 5. Seems like that was right in the referee's line of sight. No call. 6. Hmmm, might the Duke player have been holding the ND player first? I could've lived with a no call on this play. |
1. travel
2. PC 3. No travel, yes foul 4. flop and No call 5. good screen 6. no call |
Quote:
If that's not displacement, nothing is. |
1) barely can see what happened. Definitely nothing to learn from this play
2) what are we debating on this play? 3) ??? I see a POE foul. 4) PC followed by a travel. 5) I think the official guessed on this play based on the embellishment of the player who was screened. 6) I don't think the official sees the whole play and the defender embellishes contact. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Play 1: Can't tell. Probably held ball or nothing.
Play 2: Block at that level. Play 3: No travel, foul. Play 4: Offensive foul Play 5: Nothing Play 6: Offensive foul |
That contact is not a PC, no matter how many times I watch it. The offensive player is moving east/west and the defender is not. The onus of that contact is on the defense. I have a no call. Travel, maybe. In real life I may not see that travel.
|
1. Inconclusive. I can't see with high certainty in the video how much, if any, the defender prevented the release. It really needed a view from a different angle to be sure.
2. PC...defender was legal long before contact, shooter when through him 3. Seems like a basic handcheck to me 4. Block, defender moving into the path of an airborne opponent and toward white at the time of contact. Even if it was somewhat backward, the airborne component of the play prevents the defender from moving into his path at that time. It was a travel, but I'm not going with that since the contact may have contributed to the travel. Must go with the foul. No shot since it occurred before the shooter was on the way up for a shot. 5. Fooled the referee....no foul occurred. 6. Holding foul on the defender....which caused the reaction from the offensive player which drew the offensive foul call. No call OK but NOT an offensive foul. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1) no way to know without closer angle, but looks like a travel
2) again, bad angle but looks like a block 3) ?? not sure what we are even talking about 4) PC, defender has LGP and moves to maintain it, offensive player goes through his chest. Followed by a travel 5) no call. 6) this is not a good call. its a no call. |
I know after seeing plenty of plays this year where players (mainly defenders) are embellishing the amount of contact (or straight up faking being fouled), this off-season I'm going to be working on seeing entire plays before putting whistles on them.
|
Am I the only one that sees the screen in #5 as illegal for not respecting the time and distance principle?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The opponent in the video was not allowed one normal step on the blind screen. Therefore, I think the call was correct. (NCAA guys...clarify if the NCAA rule is same or different?) |
Quote:
Outside the visual field is referring to what the player should be able to see with normal head movement, not what they actually do see. They don't get a pass for not looking where they are going. |
FWIW, I had the wrong time mark on the 3rd play lol. Apologies.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08am. |