Manhattan vs. Iona False Double Fouls (Video)

[Raymond]

The first I was going to say is that W5 should be gone for 2 T's.

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

The first I was going to say is that W5 should be gone for 2 T's.

Agree.

[Raymond]

W5 received a FF1 and a T. G12 received a T.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

W5 received a FF1 and a T. G12 received a T.

The officials must have decided that the first foul by W5 occurred while the ball was live after reviewing the video.

[walt]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

The officials must have decided that the first foul by W5 occurred while the ball was live after reviewing the video.

I agree that is the only way they could have decide it in order to administer it the way they did. They shot the common foul followed by the FF1 free throws as the double T's cancel. I am confused though as to why they administered the throw in after the FF1 free throws at the division line instead of at the spot of the foul.

[deecee]

So they saw a punch thrown? But they didn't think it was a big enough punch to warrant an ejection?

I'm confused on that part.

[CNYREF]

I think everyone is confused because the announcers erroneously said they called a double tech which I don't think ever happened. They called the common foul and noticed the scrumm reviewed to see if anything bad happened decided white had a DBCT shot the 1 and 1 shot the DBcT and took to division line correctly.....?